|
[Sponsors] |
[ANSYS Meshing] Inflation layer thickness based on y+ |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Bart A.
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Understanding that an inflation layer on walls is more or less mandatory for a turbulent flow I have begun researching that.
I don't understand completely what should fall in the y+ region. Is it the first prism cell or the full prism layer? To be more concrete, if my y+ value is 3.5e-4 m, should I set that value as the first layer thickness or total thickness in the inflation setup of Ansys meshing? I found two contradicting statements on this topic. The manual states that all wall adjacent cells should be located within the log-law layer, but another site states that the y+ value is only related to the first prism layer. Could somebody please explain this? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
inflation layer, mesh, prism layer |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh - no layer added | bejbro | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 5 | February 1, 2020 20:05 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappy hangs while layer generation | bastil | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 3 | October 29, 2010 07:19 |
Boundary layer/ Sublayer thickness | dave0198 | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 7, 2010 17:29 |
compute bondary layer thickness | Ralf Schmidt | FLUENT | 2 | May 31, 2006 07:35 |
errors | Fahad | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 23, 2004 13:20 |