CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ANSYS Meshing] Microfluidic Device Meshing

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By rrr311

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 24, 2014, 15:56
Default Microfluidic Device Meshing
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
mlau3 is on a distinguished road

I'm new to the ANSYS software and I am having problems with meshing my microfluidic device (Attached Picture 1) (as Fluent tells me to improve my mesh whenever I try to run calculations on it).

The default Mesh can be viewed in detail in Attached Pictures 2-5

My question is: What are the ways that I can improve the mesh?

Any help would be very much appreciated!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.jpg (32.5 KB, 38 views)
File Type: png 2.png (43.8 KB, 35 views)
File Type: jpg 3.jpg (10.1 KB, 25 views)
File Type: jpg 4.jpg (82.5 KB, 27 views)
File Type: jpg 5.jpg (33.6 KB, 25 views)
mlau3 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 25, 2014, 00:19
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 12
rrr311 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to rrr311 Send a message via Skype™ to rrr311
Hi mlau3,

Welcome to the CFD-online forum.

A good mesh is a very important part of any CFD simulation. I am just a novice but I can direct you to create a better mesh. You might want to go through the Ansys Meshing tutorials to understand the meshing procedures. From the attached pictures, I believe that you generated an automatic mesh. You might want to slice your geometry (in the Design Modeler) so that you can generate hexa elements in the sweepable bodies and tetra elements in the rest during the meshing. Again you need to be careful when it comes to the quality of the mesh and you need to look at metrics like aspect ratio, orthogonality (> 0.1 for fluent) & skewness (< 0.95 for fluent) which can accessed through the mesh statistics. You should never stop at one mesh size. You can always get a better solution accuracy on refining the mesh. You will have to decide which mesh size would suit you based on the effectiveness of mesh in terms of accuracy & time, type of simulation, turbulence model, computational resources at hand etc.

I could write pages to explain the importance of a good mesh. But I would suggest you to take it slowly. Convergence, mesh sensitivity, accuracy, time step size... the list goes on.

If you don't have time to go through all the tutorials then, watch:

If you want read more about Mesh Quality, refer:


Keep me posted on how things go .

rgd likes this.
rrr311 is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OpenFOAM compile error balkrishna OpenFOAM Installation 9 June 17, 2011 03:53
Compiling OpenFOAM on kaergaard OpenFOAM Installation 1 June 16, 2011 01:33
Singularity of grid?Volume meshing vs face meshing Ken Main CFD Forum 0 September 4, 2003 11:09
Volume Meshing & Face Meshing? singularity of grid ken FLUENT 0 September 4, 2003 11:08

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:49.