CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ANSYS Meshing] boundary layer quality & mesh refinement

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 2, 2023, 08:25
Default boundary layer quality & mesh refinement
  #1
New Member
 
Robert Hüsken
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: NRW, Germany
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
RobertH is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,


I’m new to CFD and to ANSYS's software and I want to do a master thesis on bicycle wheel aerodynamics. In a first step, I want to investigate the drag force of the leading edge of a bicycle wheel in 2D using different tire shapes. In the future I want to switch to 3D, simulate a small section of the leading edge and maybe a full wheel.

At this moment I experience problems with the meshing. Up to now I have used DesignModeler for the geometries and Ansys Meshing for creating the meshes. Some colleagues already helped me on some aspects of my meshes and told me to get y+ = 1. Simulations were carried out using Ansys Fluent with k-w-SST-model and a lot of default settings. The flow in x-direction is 10 m/s.

  1. With mesh (1), I calculated a “lift force” (y direction) of 0.2 N in ANSYS Fluent (compared to 0.6 N drag force). I think anything different from 0 N is nonsense. With meshes (2), (3), (4) the lift forces were 0.006 N, 0.035 N and -0.019 N respectively. Can this difference be explained only by the poor boundary layer of mesh (1)?
  2. In (detail boundary layer) the boundary layers are parallel to the geometry except of the cell inside the corner (meshes 2, 3, 4). Is this an issue and if yes, how can the boundary layers be arranged so that they lay perfectly parallel to the geometry?
  3. I tried to make a mesh like (5) and visualized it in MS Paint. However, by splitting up my body I was only able to generate meshes (3) and (4), I couldn’t generate a mesh like (5). My idea was to have a block structured mesh with a finer mesh inside the inner rectangle. Is the mesh (5) better than (3), (4) and if yes, how could I generate such a mesh? If required I can explain how I generated (3) and (4).
  4. The geometry is symmetric in y-direction. Is it possible to specify a symmetry axis/plane and mesh symmetrically around that? Using just half of the geometry with a symmetry BC in the simulation is not an option because I want to change the angle of attack.
  5. Could I use either of the meshes as a base for a 3D mesh with prisms of this shape in z direction? If yes, how does it work?
I’d be grateful for help on any of these questions! Anything that I’ve done so far is debatable since I have little to no experience with CFD.


Best regards
Robert
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mesh_01.jpg (165.6 KB, 15 views)
RobertH is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to set boundary conditions for cylinder+orifice mesh JD_PM OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 March 1, 2022 05:02
sliding mesh problem in CFX Saima CFX 46 September 11, 2021 07:38
[snappyHexMesh] layer not added Rasmusiwersen OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 1 January 2, 2020 09:43
Question about heat transfer coefficient setting for CFX Anna Tian CFX 1 June 16, 2013 06:28
Error finding variable "THERMX" sunilpatil CFX 8 April 26, 2013 07:00


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:21.