|
[Sponsors] |
[GAMBIT] Boundary Layer without using Cooper scheme |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 4, 2011, 05:25 |
Boundary Layer without using Cooper scheme
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 140
Rep Power: 15 |
Dear all,
does anybody know, whether it’s possible to create a boundary layer at the inner wall of a geometry, if I am not using the Cooper scheme to create my volume mesh? My problem is: I want to mesh the geometry of a vessel having a bifurcation. At this I want to create a boundary layer of hexahedral elements, because I need a good spatial resolution close to the wall. Afterwards I would like to fill up the rest of the geometry with tetrahedral or unstructured hexahedral elements. Unfortunately gambit refuses to mesh the surface via “Quad Map” or “Quad Submap” and due to the bifurcation I cannot use the Cooper scheme. Does anybody have an idea how I can get such a hexahedral boundary layer by using Gambit or Tgrid? Thanks a million, Lilly |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wind turbine simulation | Saturn | CFX | 58 | July 3, 2020 01:13 |
Turbulent Boundary Layer on a Flat Plate | Hoshang Garda | FLUENT | 1 | November 27, 2013 10:24 |
Boundary Layer | mahadevan.swamy | FLUENT | 1 | June 29, 2009 08:10 |
Correct way to generate grids for boundary layer | quarkz | Main CFD Forum | 5 | November 23, 2006 23:25 |
can fluent capture BOUNDARY LAYER of POROUS zone? | Alex | FLUENT | 0 | April 22, 2006 07:14 |