|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Sean Petley
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Lancaster, UK
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
I was wondering if anyone could explain if there is a difference between the Lagrangian particle tracking models in CFX and Fluent, looking at the solver guide they seem to apply the same physics but I might be wrong?
Cheers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Farzin
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 11 ![]() |
There are differences in models used as forces acting on particles, namely:
-Drag law, Different options available in CFX and Fluent. -Shear lift force, Only available in Fluent. -and maybe other physical models... -for Turbulence dispersion effect, there is slightly different controls in both packages. Overall I think Fluent solver is richer and more flexible in particle tracking. But for post-processing there is more limitation on presentation of particle tracking data in Fluent(+ CFD-Post) than CFX (+ CFD-Post). Regards, Farzin |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
dispersion model with lagragian particle tracking model for incompressible flows | eelcovv | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 54 | April 10, 2018 09:36 |
The fluent stopped and errors with "Emergency: received SIGHUP signal" | yuyuxuan | FLUENT | 0 | December 3, 2013 22:56 |
Check particle impaction with User Fortran | Julian K. | CFX | 3 | January 12, 2012 09:46 |
Transient Particle Tracking CFX 12.0.1 | tav98f | CFX | 0 | February 25, 2011 11:05 |
Euler-Euler vs. Lagrangian particle tracking for biomass pyrolysis in a rotary kiln | audrey | Main CFD Forum | 0 | February 22, 2011 12:09 |