CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Straight through cyclone with particles

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 21, 2012, 15:59
Default Straight through cyclone with particles
New Member
Roger Hoffmann
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 14
rogerhoffmann is on a distinguished road

I am running some cases of a straight through cyclone, with particles. I am running it steady state, air ideal gas, k-epsilon, with Uniform in Diameter by Mass distribution (see below).

It all seemed to work fine for a series of calculations, but when I was changing some variables like, temperature (increased some degrees), reduced density of the particle material, then I began to obtain results with about 30% - 50% of the particles EXCEEDED INTEGRATION LIMIT, or DISTANCE or TIME. I tried many times to increase this limits, but all I had was huge computational time, and the results did not improve much.

My questions:
1 - Do this particles that are being terminated affect the results, or they can be just ignored?
2 - I understand that this particles are being trapped in some region of the flow. How to discover where is this happening? Could this be a mesh issue?
3 - Is it possible to know which particles are being trapped, where they originate, or their diameter?
4 - I used the Injection at Face Centres at first, but when I wanted to increase the number of particles using uniform injection (to improve the results), I also had lot of particles being terminated. Why? It seems that only using Injection at Face Centres and certain conditions I can run without particles being terminated.

Any tips, suggestions, could help.
Thank you,

FLUID: Particulas
Option = Zero Slip Velocity
Maximum Diameter = 1 [mm]
Minimum Diameter = 0.54 [micron]
Option = Uniform in Diameter by Mass
Mass Flow Rate = 6.94e-4 [kg s^-1]
Option = Injection at Face Centres
rogerhoffmann is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 21, 2012, 19:42
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,638
Rep Power: 142
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
I suspect this means that as you changed the conditions then you entered a regime where the particles just go round and round and never exit the domain. This means the particle tracks get very long, computational load goes up and it terminates the tracks at the limits you define (and gives the warning message).

Your questions:
1) If the particles never leave then they might build up into a bed or something. You need to consider whether this is possible.
2) Look at the particle tracks. That should show what they are doing.
3) Yes, all this is available in the post processor.
4) Again, look for why they are terminated. Generally it is because they end up in a vortex and never leave.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to determine the number of particles injected. welch FLUENT 2 January 18, 2024 05:08
[DPM problem] infinite particles loop in domain (twin cyclone - double cyclone)) ghost82 FLUENT 6 May 19, 2020 15:19
trying to simulate two-phase jet flow with particles in surface injection ajkratos FLUENT 5 March 3, 2015 22:33
Cyclone DPM Cylindrical Particles Mohsin FLUENT 0 August 3, 2010 04:23
Modelling Industrial cyclone behaviour GŁnther Hasse Main CFD Forum 3 October 12, 1999 20:34

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:51.