|
[Sponsors] |
How to insert a heat source only in the fluid part of a fluid-air domain? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 20, 2015, 08:19 |
How to insert a heat source only in the fluid part of a fluid-air domain?
|
#1 |
New Member
Camila Braga Vieira
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 14 |
Dear all,
I am dealing with a problem in which I have to insert a source only in the fluid domain of a fluid-air system. So far I have created an expression which is written below: 304 [W/m^3]*Fluid 1.Volume Fraction After few interactions I checked in my output file if the power in each domain where I've inserted the source corresponded to the correct power. Indeed, the power was correct for the Fluid part of each domain, but in the air part, which should not contain any power, it also contained a power (19% of the power in the Fluid part). Therefore, I would like to know if anyone here could help me to understand why does this power, in the air part of the domain, appear and how to prevent this to happen, since I am interested in put a heat source term in the fluid part only. Thank you very much in advance. Camila |
|
August 20, 2015, 11:05 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,865
Rep Power: 33 |
Not sure about your multiphase setup details, i.e. homogeneous or not. However, is the fluid dependent sources tab available ? if so, you only add the source to the fluid of interest.
|
|
August 20, 2015, 11:33 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Camila Braga Vieira
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 14 |
Thank you for your comment.
Actually I have a porous domain, in which the free surface is an interface to air. The source which should only be in the fluid, located in the porous region, is an uniform volumetric heat source. Therefore, I have created a subdomain (inside my domain which contains the porous region and air on top of it) with Energy Source corresponding to the following expression: 304 [W/m^3]*Fluid 1. VolumeFraction (1) The idea of multiplying the volumetric source by the Fluid 1. VolumeFraction is an attempt to guarantee that the source would only be applied in the volume where there is fluid. For the part of the domain without fluid, only air, the source should be 0, since Fluid 1.VolumeFraction is zero. However, I have not observed that in my output file, once I have also seen in my results that I have power been generated in the air. Could you please explain why does this power appear in the air region? Would my approach (Eqn. 1) be defined in a wrong way? What would be a better way to define my uniform volumetric heat source only in the porous domain with the fluid and avoid any power to be in the air part of my domain? Thank you very much for your help! Camila |
|
August 20, 2015, 19:26 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,842
Rep Power: 144 |
The approach you describe should work as far as I know.
But keep in mind at the interface (or any mixed region) the VF will be an intermediate value, so the air in this region will get heated. This air will convect away and heat the bulk air. To get around this you could replace Fluid 1.volumefraction with something like (Fluid 1.volumefraction)^10. This would only heat the regions which are just about pure water and any significant amount of air would stop the heating. |
|
August 21, 2015, 08:09 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Camila Braga Vieira
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 14 |
Thank you very, very much!!
|
|
Tags |
heat source term |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Setting the height of the stream in the free channel | kevinmccartin | CFX | 12 | October 13, 2022 22:43 |
[swak4Foam] funkyDoCalc with OF2.3 massflow | NiFl | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 14 | November 25, 2020 04:30 |
Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? | mpeppels | CFX | 11 | August 22, 2019 08:30 |
Trouble compiling utilities using source-built OpenFOAM | Artur | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 14 | October 29, 2013 11:59 |
[swak4Foam] funkySetFields compilation error | tayo | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 39 | December 3, 2012 06:18 |