CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

How to setup initail conditions in steady solution

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree10Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 8, 2016, 03:59
Default How to setup initail conditions in steady solution
  #1
Senior Member
 
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14
aja1345 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I am simulating a trbine and I have problem in running after stall...

In fact, Residuals have fluctuation after stall because solution is steady and steady solution fails after stall because there are massive separations.

But i want to have better convergence after stall for having better results. I think that this convergence is related to initial guess but i am new in CFX and i don't know that how to set up that. I am grateful that guide me about these cases.

Now, Have you any idea and suggestions?

Thanks.

Best.

Aja

Last edited by aja1345; May 13, 2016 at 14:50.
aja1345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 8, 2016, 05:36
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
This FAQ covers this topic: http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys...gence_criteria

But stall is usually characterised by large scale transient turbulent structures which cannot be modelled steady state (hence your steady state model is not converging). You might be forced to use a LES class model to handle this, and that means running transient. LES class model means LES, SAS, DES or one of that class of turbulent model.
aja1345 likes this.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 8, 2016, 06:49
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14
aja1345 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
This FAQ covers this topic: http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys...gence_criteria

But stall is usually characterised by large scale transient turbulent structures which cannot be modelled steady state (hence your steady state model is not converging). You might be forced to use a LES class model to handle this, and that means running transient. LES class model means LES, SAS, DES or one of that class of turbulent model.
Hi, thanks.

I reduce time scale and convergence is better......Is this logical?

I can't find the following point:

"Read the CFX documentation. Specifically section 15 ("Advice on Flow Modeling"), section 15.10.6 ("Problems with Convergence"), and and any best practises guide applicable to your simulation"

Can you give me link of these documentations please? i can't find them.

Thanks.
aja1345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 8, 2016, 07:07
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
The FAQs are a few years old. Those sections in the documentation are probably a different section number now. But hopefully they should not be too far away so you should find them quickly enough.

If reducing time scale improves convergence this suggests you have significant numerical instability in your simulation, and the normal cause of that is mesh quality. So if you improve your mesh quality it is likely your convergence will significantly improve.
aja1345 likes this.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 8, 2016, 07:40
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14
aja1345 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
The FAQs are a few years old. Those sections in the documentation are probably a different section number now. But hopefully they should not be too far away so you should find them quickly enough.

If reducing time scale improves convergence this suggests you have significant numerical instability in your simulation, and the normal cause of that is mesh quality. So if you improve your mesh quality it is likely your convergence will significantly improve.
Mesh quality is good and also It doesn't improve more because geometry is complex....I think this is because of steady solution.....No?
aja1345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 8, 2016, 19:07
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
How do you know the mesh quality is good? Different models have different requirements on mesh quality, and the comments by the CFX solver are just a guide.

As I stated in post #2, this probably is a LES class model and those models are inherently transient. So that means you will not be able to get good results running them steady state.
aja1345 likes this.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 12, 2016, 07:26
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14
aja1345 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
How do you know the mesh quality is good? Different models have different requirements on mesh quality, and the comments by the CFX solver are just a guide.
Skewness is lower than 0.61. Mesh quality is good. right?
aja1345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 12, 2016, 09:53
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Maxim
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 415
Rep Power: 12
-Maxim- is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by aja1345 View Post
Skewness is lower than 0.61. Mesh quality is good. right?
skewness is not the only factor for a good mesh.
maybe you can post pictures of your mesh so that we can have a look.
aja1345 likes this.
-Maxim- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 12, 2016, 11:47
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14
aja1345 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by -Maxim- View Post
skewness is not the only factor for a good mesh.
maybe you can post pictures of your mesh so that we can have a look.

Last edited by aja1345; May 13, 2016 at 10:54.
aja1345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 12, 2016, 12:06
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14
aja1345 is on a distinguished road
Why are removed pictures????!!!!!!!!!!!
aja1345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 12, 2016, 12:09
Default
  #11
Senior Member
 
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14
aja1345 is on a distinguished road
Mesh........

Last edited by aja1345; May 15, 2016 at 12:43.
aja1345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 12, 2016, 12:10
Default
  #12
Senior Member
 
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14
aja1345 is on a distinguished road
Mesh........

Last edited by aja1345; May 15, 2016 at 12:42.
aja1345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 12, 2016, 12:10
Default
  #13
Senior Member
 
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14
aja1345 is on a distinguished road
Mesh.........

Last edited by aja1345; May 15, 2016 at 12:42.
aja1345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 12, 2016, 12:14
Default
  #14
Senior Member
 
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14
aja1345 is on a distinguished road
I used boundary layer option in Gambit. ...

I don't have set condition...that is default...Is this OK?

...

I am grateful that guide about these cases.

Thanks.

Last edited by aja1345; May 13, 2016 at 09:01.
aja1345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 12, 2016, 18:47
Default
  #15
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
A little distance away from the airfoil your elements have far too big aspect ratio. At the foil surface you have a small aspect ratio (which is correct, you want to model the boundary layer), but further away your aspect ratio looks to be about 10 and that is far too large.
aja1345 likes this.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 13, 2016, 04:33
Default
  #16
Senior Member
 
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14
aja1345 is on a distinguished road
Convergence became better in high angle of attack. I already had divergence in high angles of attack... thanks.



But the following convergence is not good. Why? Is there any problem?



Thanks.

Last edited by aja1345; June 4, 2016 at 08:32.
aja1345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 13, 2016, 04:42
Default
  #17
Senior Member
 
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14
aja1345 is on a distinguished road





Torque monioter:

aja1345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 13, 2016, 04:45
Default
  #18
Senior Member
 
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14
aja1345 is on a distinguished road
aja1345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 13, 2016, 04:52
Default
  #19
Senior Member
 
Maxim
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 415
Rep Power: 12
-Maxim- is on a distinguished road
looks good. What is your convergence criteria? You are well on the way to RMS < 10^-5
aja1345 likes this.
-Maxim- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 13, 2016, 05:05
Default
  #20
Senior Member
 
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14
aja1345 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by -Maxim- View Post
looks good. What is your convergence criteria? You are well on the way to RMS < 10^-5
Thanks.

My convergence criteria is 10^-5.





aja1345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unsteady simulation with steady solution as initial value kiddmax OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 August 20, 2015 05:12
is it possible to predict how long it takes to reach steady state solution in unstead Alimohamadi_nasr CFX 4 November 11, 2013 06:11
Transient Solution looks like Steady State ljwnow FLUENT 0 March 26, 2012 01:54
Steady solution from Transient simulations wawa FLUENT 2 November 9, 2010 17:44
About the difference between steady and unsteady problems Lisa Main CFD Forum 11 July 5, 2000 14:37


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:53.