Acoustic Courant Number for Supersonic analysis

Sparsh · October 6, 2015, 13:56

I'm doing a supersonic transient analysis for which my time step is 0.001s resulting acoustic courant number in CFX is 999.
would it be advisable to decrease my time step and increasing coefficient loops to 5+?
1) domain is 15x10x10 'unit' lengths
2) supersonic analysis

ghorrocks · October 6, 2015, 17:47

CFX is an implicit solver and the Courant number is not a limiting parameter. You choose a time step size which gives you accurate results and converges properly. Don't worry about the Courant number.

October 6, 2015, 13:56	Acoustic Courant Number for Supersonic analysis	#1
Sparsh New Member Sparsh Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: Moscow Posts: 10 Rep Power: 10	I'm doing a supersonic transient analysis for which my time step is 0.001s resulting acoustic courant number in CFX is 999. would it be advisable to decrease my time step and increasing coefficient loops to 5+? 1) domain is 15x10x10 'unit' lengths 2) supersonic analysis

October 6, 2015, 17:47		#2
ghorrocks Super Moderator Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 17,728 Rep Power: 143	CFX is an implicit solver and the Courant number is not a limiting parameter. You choose a time step size which gives you accurate results and converges properly. Don't worry about the Courant number. Sparsh likes this.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Decomposing meshes	Tobi	OpenFOAM Pre-Processing	22	February 24, 2023 09:23
AMI speed performance	danny123	OpenFOAM	21	October 24, 2020 04:13
foam-extend_3.1 decompose and pyfoam warning	shipman	OpenFOAM	3	July 24, 2014 08:14
[blockMesh] --> foam fatal error:	lillo763	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	0	March 5, 2014 10:27
RMS Courant Number vs MAX Courant Number	zoozoozoo	Main CFD Forum	3	June 12, 2012 13:44