CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Interface and domain in rotational flow

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 5, 2016, 02:05
Default Interface and domain in rotational flow
  #1
New Member
 
M.A.
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 10
Roose28 is on a distinguished road
Good day Sirs!

I am simulating a multiphase cross flow turbine and I uploaded 2 pictures as a reference for my 2 questions. One is a picture of my old model and the other is the new one.

I have three domains now (see reference picture). The brown one is the "CASING". The green one is the "BLADES". The blue one is the "INNER PART". Initially I only had two domains which is the CASING and the "Whole Rotor", but i separated the Whole Rotor to 2 parts as BLADES and INNER PART for meshing purposes.


Question on Domain Motion:
The CASING domain is set as stationary. The BLADES domain is set as rotating. should I set the INNER PART as rotating? or i should leave it as stationary?

Question on Interfaces:
2. the CASING and BLADES are connected via "Frozen Rotor" frame change setting. What should be my frame change setting on the interface between BLADES and INNER PART? Is it also Frozen Rotor?

Thank you very much sirs I got a bit confused as I separated the Whole Rotor domain to two parts.
Attached Images
File Type: png Capture2.PNG (155.5 KB, 27 views)
File Type: png Capture3.PNG (164.0 KB, 15 views)
Roose28 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 5, 2016, 04:57
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
I would make it a rotating frame of reference because then you do not need a frame of reference change at the GGI.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 5, 2016, 11:39
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 16
turbo is on a distinguished road
At first, you will need small extensions upstream and downstream of the blade domain to ensure a good interfacing. If you want to get performance far downstream of the turbine blade, you will need to go with a separate stationary domain like you did for the new model. Since you have a 360 deg blade domain, no choices but to apply the frozen rotor if steady state solution is wanted. BTW what is the application and working fluid? Curious 'cause you said of multiphase.
turbo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2016, 00:20
Default
  #4
New Member
 
M.A.
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 10
Roose28 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by turbo View Post
At first, you will need small extensions upstream and downstream of the blade domain to ensure a good interfacing. If you want to get performance far downstream of the turbine blade, you will need to go with a separate stationary domain like you did for the new model. Since you have a 360 deg blade domain, no choices but to apply the frozen rotor if steady state solution is wanted. BTW what is the application and working fluid? Curious 'cause you said of multiphase.
Hi turbo, thank you very much for the help! i am simulating a cross flow turbine with air and water on it, i inputted them as standard homogeneous free surface model. I am still refining my settings. I left the Advanced Settings Tab of the Solver Control untouched; would you think changing the settings below would help? :

Body forces -> Volume-Weighted
Velocity Pressure Coupling -> Rhie Chow 4th
Multiphase Control -> Volume Fraction coupling

I did not have formal training on CFX and i cannot fully grasp the CFX guides.
Thanks turbo.
Roose28 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2016, 00:22
Default
  #5
New Member
 
M.A.
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 10
Roose28 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
I would make it a rotating frame of reference because then you do not need a frame of reference change at the GGI.
Thanks for the help Sir!

I am still refining my simulation, Should I include the following settings below? (for the Advanced Settings Tab of Solver Control):

Velocity Pressure Coupling -------> Rhie Chow 4th order
Multiphase Control --------> Volume Fraction coupling
Body forces --------> Volume-Weighted

I am using the default setting, wherein none of those three are set.
I cannot fully grasp their definitions in the CFX guide.
Roose28 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
cfx, cross flow, interface, multiphase


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sliding mesh problem in CFX Saima CFX 46 September 11, 2021 07:38
Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? mpeppels CFX 11 August 22, 2019 07:30
Question about heat transfer coefficient setting for CFX Anna Tian CFX 1 June 16, 2013 06:28
Error finding variable "THERMX" sunilpatil CFX 8 April 26, 2013 07:00
RPM in Wind Turbine Pankaj CFX 9 November 23, 2009 04:05


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:30.