|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
yaseen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Hawler
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
hello
I simulated free surface flow but the result show a very large difference between CFX and experiment, as well I take measurements at VF 0.1 at the location shown in attached image (has high air concentration) so: 1- CFX can predict flow in such condition? 2- I used supercritical outlet boundary condition according to ANSYS CFX guide and homogeneous multiphase flow please help me in this problem. http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/att...1&d=1466348828 http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/att...1&d=1466348829 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Monte Carlo Simulation: H-Energy is not convergating & high Incident Radiation | volleyHC | CFX | 5 | April 3, 2016 05:41 |
Tu and boundary condition in CFX | radon | CFX | 0 | November 23, 2010 04:24 |
Francis turbin difference between experiment values and CFD 2 | snoopy | CFX | 7 | January 7, 2010 17:10 |
CFX Air conditioning Simulation_expression help!!!! Urgen!!! | yin2 | CFX | 6 | March 30, 2009 23:34 |
Francis differences between CFX and experiments! | Nicola | CFX | 14 | March 13, 2008 06:23 |