|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
I have done a steady state simulation of a vertical axis wind turbine. The solution has converged to a max residual of 1e-5 but i get an excessive torque value so I'm having my doubts on the physics setup.
The steps i have followed are: 1.- Draw the wind turbine blades 2.- Draw a cylinder around the blades (rotating fluid) 3.- Draw a large frustum around the blades 4.- Substract the cylinder from the frustum to obtain the outer volume shown in the image. 5.- Subtract the blades from the cylinder to obtain the inner volume shown in the image. ![]() * The cylinder containing the blades is set as a rotating domain with the design rotational speed of the turbine and Z rotation axis (turbine axis). * The frustum is a stationary domain. The boundary conditions i have used are: - Inlet the left and lateral faces of the frustum, with a velocity component in the X axis (free stream of air). - Outlet at the right face of the frustum. - Interfaces between the frustum and cylinder common faces, with frozen rotor frame change - Wall at the blades. My questions are: 1.- Is the physics setup correct? 2.- The real torque in the turbine oscillates with time due to the angular rotation and different angles of attack. The torque obtained by CFX is the average over time? 3.- What is the physical effect of increasing the volume of the cylinder around the blades (with rotating fluid) ? It currently contains the blades tightly (cylinder height = 1.2x blade height) Last edited by Jorge22; July 5, 2016 at 21:21. Reason: image upload |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,933
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Q1 - probably not. But you should do the first level of investigation yourself. Have a look in the post processor - do the streamlines look reasonable? Is the rotor rotating in the correct direction? Are you getting attached flow where you expect, and separations where you expect?
Q2 - If you modelled this as frozen rotor the torque returned is the instantaneous torque at this angle in the rotation. Q3 - It should be no effect. If this has an effect it shows there is a problem in your setup. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
New Member
Fenil Modi
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
i have followed same procedure which you have done.
i had make mesh in ICEM CFD 16.2 and run simulation in fluent 16.2 but i never got torque (moment) above 0. i have give the rotating zone to frame motion and my aerofoils are stationary wall. i have almost try all model like k-e (std and realizable), k-w(SST), S-A etc. please any one give me some idea. why this is happening with me. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,933
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Try the fluent forum.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
New Member
Fenil Modi
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
hi ghorrocks;
thanks for your reply.but i dont know whats this fluent forum? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,933
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
vertical axis, wind turbine |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High torque coefficient Cm for Vertical Axis Wind Turbine (VAWT) | tony00 | FLUENT | 11 | July 23, 2018 06:13 |
[ICEM] Boundary conditions in copy-rotate 3-bladed vertical axis wind turbine | pollenhavy | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 2 | February 17, 2017 17:01 |
CFD analysis on wind turbine rotor | Ken (Wind Turbine CFD Super Rookie) | Main CFD Forum | 45 | February 9, 2016 14:07 |
Airflow over Vertical Axis Wind TUrbine | sthoms78 | ANSYS | 8 | April 10, 2013 02:31 |
Vertical Axis Wind Turbine | courtjester140 | ANSYS | 2 | June 22, 2010 10:27 |