|
[Sponsors] |
April 20, 2017, 12:03 |
Y plus value
|
#1 |
New Member
Mohan Kumar Dey
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Busan, South Korea
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 9 |
Hlw Everyone. I need one help. I want to know, how to calculate the Wall Y Plus from CFD-Post, please teach me. I know how to calculate Y plus value and also how to generate Y plus mesh but I want to check, the Y plus value in CFD-Post please help me.
|
|
April 20, 2017, 15:24 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Erik
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Earth (Land portion)
Posts: 1,171
Rep Power: 23 |
Make a contour plot on the wall of Yplus.
|
|
April 20, 2017, 22:13 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Mohan Kumar Dey
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Busan, South Korea
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 9 |
||
April 21, 2017, 01:17 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
urosgrivc
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Slovenija
Posts: 365
Rep Power: 11 |
You can only see Y+ value in the 1st mesh element from any of the surfaces you have.
1 You can make a plane, and plot y+ but everithing will be grey exept 1st elements near wals you will se your y+ there. 2 As Evcelica wrote make a contour on the suface of you interest and plot y+ contour advantage of plane over contour is that you can (render shov mesh lines) and actualy see the thicknes or other properties of your mesh)) i think it is usefull. |
|
April 27, 2017, 02:57 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 357
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi All
Sorry to ask you, I am not aware of this Y+ calculation at my wall. But I have a complex geometry and when I check the contour plot for a mid plane or wall in CFD-Post I can see the values goes from 0.03 to 23. So now am bit scared if its ok or not. And also the problem is this higher y+ is on some sharp corners and uniform surfaces have around 2 as my y+. But I dint do any y+ calculation when I did the mesh. I just took an average mesh size and resolved the wall with an isolation layer thickness. |
|
April 27, 2017, 07:17 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,728
Rep Power: 143 |
It is normal for y+ to vary over a range.
So do a sensitivity analysis and see if the mesh you have is OK or not. |
|
April 27, 2017, 07:59 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 357
Rep Power: 14 |
But then according to the theory the y+ should be 1 right, for k-w model ? And by sensitivity study you mean to try with different meshes right ?
|
|
April 27, 2017, 08:05 |
|
#8 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,728
Rep Power: 143 |
Yes, sensitivity study means trying different meshes.
Note that if the larger y+ happens in a region where nothing much happens then it won't matter too much. But you are right, for k-w you will need to keep y+ to around 1 in important areas for good accuracy. Why are using k-w? SST is a better general choice as it allows automatic wall functions which can handle a wider range of y+. It also has many other benefits and includes many interesting sub-models not available on other 2-equation models (curvature correct, turbulence transition, DES, SAS) |
|
April 27, 2017, 08:18 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 357
Rep Power: 14 |
Well my geometry has a sharp corner and there comes the y+ around 23 but other regions its 2 or less than that...I believe thats because of the geometry that the inflation layer is not able to keep that spacing constant. I am not sure though. And regarding k-w, as it was proposed by my professor, that k-w is better than k-e although he is not aware of the cfx options.But I was using the k-w RANS value to restart my LES- WALE model , where am using the same mesh.
|
|
April 27, 2017, 18:20 |
|
#10 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,728
Rep Power: 143 |
y+ really only applies to where a boundary layer is growing and is important to the model. Boundary layers are not really important (usually) at sharp edges and recirculations.
I would keep an open mind about turbulence models. Even better, try a few of them and see how they go in comparison to each other. |
|
April 28, 2017, 02:49 |
|
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 357
Rep Power: 14 |
Ok Glenn
Thanks a lot for your recommendations. |
|
|
|