|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Joseph M
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
I have just completed my impeller design using Vista CPD and created the cavitation simulation on Ansys CFX. However, I am having some difficulty with two important things. What is the method required to show the effect of cavitation on vibration using Ansys? I would like to show the vibration effects caused by the vapour bubbles on the impeller. Furthermore, is there a way to show the Vibration Spectrum of the impeller which shows the peaks caused by the cavitation. I heard that this involves determining the flow induced vibrations on Ansys.
The attached pictures shows both the steps which I have undertaken and the cavitation effects on a small section of the impeller. The red section on the impeller shows the areas where the cavitation effect are very prominent. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,916
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This sounds very challenging. I am not sure the built in cavitation model in CFX will be suitable for this.
I would recommend you try a transient cavitation model and compare the spectrum against a benchmark experiment. I would not attempt your impeller model unless you had confidence that you can predict cavitation vibration spectrums for a benchmark solution. If you are not already aware I would expect to get a good simulation for cavitation vibration spectrum will take some time. I would be thinking a month of work for an experienced CFD person. Make sure you are aware of the difficulty of a project like this. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
New Member
Joseph M
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Is it possible to do it on Ansys Fluent then after running the simulation, I can carry out a Fourier Power Spectral Density graph?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,916
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You could theoretically do it in any CFD code with a cavitation model. Then you can do any post processing on it you like. But my point is to get this accurate, regardless of the solver, will be very challenging.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
New Member
Joseph M
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Quote:
Furthermore, is it possible to nonetheless to get a less accurate vibration spectrum in a short time period? The result does not have to be very accurate; since it just needs to have a logical/realistic outcome. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,916
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Transient cavitation model means a cavitation model in a transient simulation. So you can get the time history of the pressure, which you obviously need for a vibration spectrum.
You need to do enough validation and verification to convince yourself that your results are good enough for the accuracy you require. That is why a benchmark result is so important - then you can assess how accurate you are. Until you compare against a benchmark you are just guessing, and in my experience in CFD guesses are always wrong. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
New Member
Joseph M
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,916
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Do you mean using FlowWorks or whatever the CFD solver in Solidworks is? The difficulty is in understanding the physics and developing appropriate models for it. You will have this issue regardless of which flow solver you use.
I do not know of any CFD solver which can do cavitation models in the frequency domain. This means that any CFD solver you use will require a transient simulation to get the spectrum. And by the way: What type of project is this? Are you an undergraduate? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
New Member
Joseph M
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,916
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
OK, good. This is definitely a post-graduate level project, so I am glad to hear you are a post-graduate.
My recommendation would be to use CFX (of course, I am biased there), but to then do a careful validation of the CFX cavitation model against some benchmark results. I do not know if you will be able to find a good set of spectrum results - they will be of great value if they exist for you so I would do a thorough search for them. You really need to know whether you can produce reasonable pressure spectrums from the CFX cavitation model before proceeding. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
New Member
Joseph M
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Quote:
However, my actual project will be done for a company which has given me all of their operating data, impeller main dimensions, and their spectrum results. So I have to repeat the same methodology I am doing now for their data. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,916
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That sounds very good, that sounds like the sort of data you need. Have you successfully reproduced the cavitation spectrums, either for the journal article or the company's impeller?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
New Member
Joseph M
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Quote:
I wanted to ask, with regards to the Ansys Vibration Spectrum, I know that it is possible to use Fourier Method on Ansys Fluent, but I am not sure how to apply that on Ansys CFX. Last edited by DKY2Y; December 3, 2017 at 15:59. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,916
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I am not familiar with the features of Fluent. CFX does have some Fourier methods for doing rotating machinery, but I don't think they are appropriate for what you are looking at. So I do not think CFX has anything more sophisticated than a transient simulation to do what you are looking for.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
New Member
Joseph M
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,916
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This is very basic CFX stuff - have you done the CFX tutorials? They are available on the ANSYS Customer webpage.
The error is simply saying you need to define an initial condition, and that you have a transient simulation but have not defined any transient results files. These are straight forward errors to fix. Also, I note you have defined a time step size. Where did you get that from? If it is a guess it is definitely wrong ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
New Member
Joseph M
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,916
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In that case do some transient simulation tutorials so you see the additional options for transient simulations. But when you set up your case I strongly recommend you use adaptive time stepping, homing in on 3-5 coefficient loops per iteration. Make sure the max and min time steps are wide enough you never hit them and the initial time step size is a reasonable guess (and guess small if you don't know what is reasonable). This will stop one of the most common newbie errors of using far too big a time step.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
New Member
Joseph M
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Quote:
In Analysis 'Flow Analysis 1' - Domain 'Default Domain': Transient analyses require that initial conditions are specified unless an Initial Values file is specified at run-time. I tried defining the transient result file but it is not working for some reason. EDIT: I figured out how to solve the issue since some variables were missing Last edited by DKY2Y; January 29, 2018 at 16:00. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 62
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
Also, 24 total seconds, may take a very very long time to solve. Especially when using a proper time step for transient turbo machinery. These settings are probably appropriate for something rotating at 100 rpm.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Centrifugal Pump Cavitation Simulation in Fluent | joshghoun | FLUENT | 0 | September 16, 2014 10:49 |
CFD simulation of centrifugal pump cavitation | billy7590 | Fluent Multiphase | 0 | March 22, 2014 09:28 |
CFD simulation of centrifugal pump cavitation | billy7590 | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 22, 2014 03:27 |
Centrifugal Pump Cavitation problem or not. | ismael.s | CFX | 13 | February 27, 2012 09:00 |
cavitation impeller centrifugal pump | mino2006 | CFX | 2 | September 19, 2007 13:16 |