CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Accurate results but bad imbalances?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 1, 2018, 16:13
Default Accurate results but bad imbalances?
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 89
Rep Power: 9
Guille1811 is on a distinguished road
Hi, im doing a standard simulation of an axial fan. The simulation results are less than 5% different from the technical specifications of the fan (power, max outlet velocity and average outlet velocity) and the relevant variables of the system (velocity, absolute pressure and fan power) they all converged perfectly to a 100% stable value.

That being said, the simulation imbalances didnīt converge to zero at all (see image attached, final imbalances on the right side).

My question is: can i overlook this imbalances situation due to the fact that the actual results are accurate enough for my needs? If yes, then why it can be overlooked?

Thanks in advance!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg imbalances.jpg (140.8 KB, 72 views)
Guille1811 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 1, 2018, 16:46
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,903
Rep Power: 28
Gert-Jan will become famous soon enough
In general, you cannot neglect this. Also, mostly the imbalances go to zero quite quickly.

On th other hand, the imbalance is relative to the flow coming into the domain (if I'm correct). So, if you don't have an inlet, then the behaviour you observe is normal.
Then, the imbalance is relative to the interface flow, which is very small in your case. That could also explain the behavior your observe.
Gert-Jan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 1, 2018, 18:08
Default
  #3
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,841
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Global imbalances are just that - for mass, it is the sum total of all mass entering or leaving boundaries, and any creation or destruction of mass (such as source terms), and the accumulation/loss of mass (transient only). If you have a large mass imbalance it means that these do not balance out so some mass is being gained or lost somewhere. Same goes for momentum, heat and all the other variables.

The imbalance % is calculated by the global imbalance divided by some number which indicates how much fluid is going through the domain - it might be the flux at the largest boundary (need to check that). You have to be a bit careful about imbalances in simulations which only have one boundary such as flows surrounded by ambient air which commonly only have a single opening boundary to the surrounding atmosphere. As the imbalance calculation in this case becomes the boundary flow divided by the absolute value of the boundary flow the imbalance will flip between 100% and -100% and never converge to zero, even for a converged solution. Therefore the imbalance is not always an appropriate measure of convergence, and that is why you are able to turn it off.

In these cases have a look at the magnitude of the imbalance compared to the magnitude of the total mass in the domain. You will have to calculate this manually. It will give you an idea of whether the magnitude of the mass gain/loss is significant relative to the total mass.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 15, 2018, 14:46
Default
  #4
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 89
Rep Power: 9
Guille1811 is on a distinguished road
Well the imbalance is in the order of magnitude of 1E-6 kg and the total mass of that domain is around 1,5 kg. That being said, is a good enough argument to say that this imbalance situation is not significant due to corresponding to such a tiny percentage of the domain mass?
Guille1811 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 15, 2018, 17:07
Default
  #5
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,841
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
That is problem dependent - for some purposes that is unacceptable and for some they can get away with it. You need to assess in your case.

If you can't work out directly what imbalance you are happy with then do a sensitivity analysis. Do a simulation with imbalances 10x tighter and 10x looser and see if it makes a difference big enough that you care about it.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mixture model not give me accurate results? mariam.sara Fluent Multiphase 9 August 12, 2016 02:19
Problem: Very long "write" time (~2h-3h) for results and transient results Shawn_A CFX 16 April 12, 2016 21:49
Comparing Air numerical results with water experimental results cristian2009es Main CFD Forum 1 July 2, 2014 19:11
Grid Refinement Study - How many cells necessary for accurate results? ejvikings FLUENT 1 January 22, 2012 01:33
Bad Cd results applying k-ε models to hydrofoil spk FLUENT 1 December 10, 2011 09:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:26.