CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

CFX 20.2 Error #001100279 has occured in subroutine ErrAction

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By JuPa
  • 1 Post By Gert-Jan

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 9, 2020, 17:35
Default CFX 20.2 Error #001100279 has occured in subroutine ErrAction
  #1
New Member
 
Tulo Stone
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 5
Tulo is on a distinguished road
Hi All,

I do have a .def file from a simulation that run successfully on CFX-5.7 (2005) and the results are there.

I am reading this file into CFX-20.2 and the run is returning the attached error after 100 iterations.

How do I solve this error?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg cfxErrorMessage.JPG (151.9 KB, 18 views)
Tulo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 9, 2020, 17:55
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
JuPa's Avatar
 
Mr CFD
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Britain
Posts: 361
Rep Power: 14
JuPa is on a distinguished road
Read the warnings. It's telling you your outlet has stuff coming into it. Either move the outlet further away or set it to an opening.

It even suggests a corrective action - "If this situation persists, consider switching to an Opening type boundary condition instead."

Also you have particle tracking issues. Disable particle tracking and run the simulation and see if that isolates the problem.


Edit: if you're just re-running the 2005 results into a 2020 version then there may be issues Discretisation has changed in the last 15 years. By way of example in multiphase flow the so-called "minimum volume fraction" which is set to 1e-6 has changed values so many times over so many versions that if you ran a simulation with it on using old CFX and ran it on new CFX it would error out.
Tulo likes this.
JuPa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 9, 2020, 18:41
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,836
Rep Power: 27
Gert-Jan will become famous soon enough
We at the forum are experienced users that run simulations on a daily basis with the latest versions. We do not wait 15 years before rerunning an old case. Therefore, don't expect us to have an answer ready straight away. This is a very uncommon situation for us.

Nevertheless, you have a very complicated simulation with particles in a coal combustion calculation with radiation. It would be strange if things would not have changed in 15 years. And what has changed? Only ANSYS knows. Therefore, I would double check all settings before hand in CFX-Pre.

BTW, did you generate a new definition file using CFX-Pre? Or did you start from the original definition file
Tulo likes this.
Gert-Jan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 9, 2020, 20:05
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Tulo Stone
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 5
Tulo is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by JuPa View Post
Read the warnings. It's telling you your outlet has stuff coming into it. Either move the outlet further away or set it to an opening.

It even suggests a corrective action - "If this situation persists, consider switching to an Opening type boundary condition instead."

Also you have particle tracking issues. Disable particle tracking and run the simulation and see if that isolates the problem.


Edit: if you're just re-running the 2005 results into a 2020 version then there may be issues Discretisation has changed in the last 15 years. By way of example in multiphase flow the so-called "minimum volume fraction" which is set to 1e-6 has changed values so many times over so many versions that if you ran a simulation with it on using old CFX and ran it on new CFX it would error out.

Many thanks JuPa, I have fixed the boundary error issue. I guess I have to relook into the set-up, understand and perhaps fix the changed portions.
Tulo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 9, 2020, 20:14
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Tulo Stone
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 5
Tulo is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gert-Jan View Post
We at the forum are experienced users that run simulations on a daily basis with the latest versions. We do not wait 15 years before rerunning an old case. Therefore, don't expect us to have an answer ready straight away. This is a very uncommon situation for us.

Nevertheless, you have a very complicated simulation with particles in a coal combustion calculation with radiation. It would be strange if things would not have changed in 15 years. And what has changed? Only ANSYS knows. Therefore, I would double check all settings before hand in CFX-Pre.

BTW, did you generate a new definition file using CFX-Pre? Or did you start from the original definition file
Thanks Gert-Jan, I guess I have to relook into the changed portions in the couple of years I have been away from CFD, I had been with DEM in the couple of years so, yeah, I have missed a lot.

I did started with an old definition, recreated it with unsuccessful validation of problem physics and the error is as attached.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg cfxErrorMessage2.JPG (98.6 KB, 9 views)
Tulo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 10, 2020, 02:49
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,836
Rep Power: 27
Gert-Jan will become famous soon enough
That is not an error. Just a warning that you use expert parameters. In principle nothing to worry about. I would go for it.
Gert-Jan is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
#cfx, #error001100279


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Compiling User Fortran with CFX 14.0 on Win64 Raijin Thunderkeg CFX 29 March 9, 2016 11:45
ERROR #001100279 has occurred in subroutine ErrAction. aniseh CFX 6 October 5, 2015 11:01
GETVAR SUBROUTINE for additional variable in CFX Tuks Main CFD Forum 0 November 8, 2005 06:13
discuss user subroutine in CFX Anicorl CFX 6 August 25, 2003 17:01
CFX User Subroutine Archive David Creech Main CFD Forum 0 March 17, 1999 12:41


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:32.