CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Setting a pressure loss in cfx

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree2Likes

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 10, 2021, 01:04
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 16,726
Rep Power: 130
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
If your simulation is close enough to validation results then you have some confidence the simulation is working accurately. There is a small chance the result was just a fluke and if you make a change it will be miles off - running a different mesh size would confirm whether this has happened.

Your second question is an FAQ:
stfahim likes this.
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 10, 2021, 11:33
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,404
Rep Power: 27
Opaque will become famous soon enough
Just be careful.

Solutions are ONLY converged when the mathematical statement is satisfied, i.e. the residual of the system is ZERO.

Solutions can ONLY be unique for a given method when they no longer depend on any of the discretizations parameters, i.e. mesh size, timestep, under relaxation, etc

Achieving the above is most of the time too costly, and sometimes not worth the additional effort since the models being solved already include a certain amount of error, i.e. they only approximate the real problem. Then, the experience working with specific models comes in, and in the end, it is YOUR criteria and responsibility to decide.

However, be careful of the practice of "solution is converged because my variable of choice is no longer changing". Here is a counterexample,

Say we want to find the root of f(x) = x^2 + 1, i.e. solving the problem

f(x) = x^2 + 1 = 0

If you use an iterative method, it will lead towards a constant value of 0, i.e. exactly where the residual is at its minimum, but a real-valued solution does NOT exist. What will you do then?

Food for thought
stfahim likes this.
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.

Last edited by Opaque; June 10, 2021 at 18:33.
Opaque is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 15, 2021, 00:40
Smile Thank you
New Member
Saiyed Tasnim Md. Fahim
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Obninsk Institute for nuclear power engineering
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 4
stfahim is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your reply. I got a better understanding.
stfahim is offline   Reply With Quote


cfx, negative heat transfer, pressure drop, pump, steam generator

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wind tunnel Boundary Conditions in Fluent metmet FLUENT 6 October 30, 2019 12:23
Periodic flow using Cyclic - comparison with Fluent nusivares OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 30 December 12, 2017 05:35
Calculation of the Governing Equations Mihail CFX 7 September 7, 2014 06:27
Question about heat transfer coefficient setting for CFX Anna Tian CFX 1 June 16, 2013 06:28
Warning 097- AB Siemens 6 November 15, 2004 04:41

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:36.