|
[Sponsors] |
November 3, 2021, 00:16 |
Physical Timescale
|
#1 |
Member
Mercurial
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 72
Rep Power: 5 |
Hi guys,
I'm working on Calculating the difference between inlet pressure and out pressure. I have a problem, my result from auto timescale and physical timescale is not same. Early, I think it is a result from the convergence of the simulation because physical timescale got RMS better. But when i change physical timescale to make RMS same auto timescale case, Pressure is similar to before. I don't understand why. Follow my searches, physical timescale just provide sufficient relaxation of the equation and not affect the result. It means the results is not different. Has Anyone even work on the physical timescale can explain ? Thanks a lot |
|
November 3, 2021, 03:02 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,727
Rep Power: 143 |
This is discussed on the thread I posted on this morning: Minimum mass and momentum RMS residual levels
The different time scales results in different machine precisions, so the final convergence level is a bit different. But hopefully the actual results between these simulations is essentially identical.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RANS Simulation with different Physical Timescale | AS_Aero | CFX | 7 | October 2, 2018 18:29 |
[Gmsh] Nasa Nozzle: Plot 3D -->gmsh -->fluent - no physical groups | Nico89 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | June 14, 2016 05:40 |
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | March 3, 2015 05:36 |
Determination of physical timescale | Chander | CFX | 2 | October 19, 2011 19:47 |
Advice on Physical Timescale | Oli | CFX | 0 | January 16, 2007 10:41 |