CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Fluent Meshing for CFX opinions

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 25, 2022, 03:47
Default Fluent Meshing for CFX opinions
  #1
siw
Senior Member
 
Stuart
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 733
Rep Power: 25
siw will become famous soon enough
I'm posting this in the CFX board instead on the Ansys Geom/Mesh board as it's for comments from CFX Users.

Read this PADT blog article (https://www.padtinc.com/2021/05/11/c...s-meshing-cfd/) and it got me thinking as a long time CFX and Ansys Meshing User.

Assumption: geometries are too complex to be split up into sweepable blocks (as I have) and make multiblock structured meshes. So, does anyone use Fluent Meshing for their CFX mesh generation, with the Hex-Core method (with the transition between octree level option)? Or do most CFX Users stay with Ansys Meshing with tetra-prism meshes? Unfortunately, the poly-hexcore meshes are invalid with CFX, which would be the best (IMO) non-multiblock, unstructured method.

I would like to 'jump ship' from CFX to Fluent, mostly on the basis of using the poly-hexcore meshes for my complex internal flow geometries, for higher mesh quality and reduced node/element quantities. Ans Ansys is putting more development into Fluent over CFX - just see the release highlights documents. Yet, Fluent lacks some features that CFX has, and then needs UDFs. And I find the CFX file management easier, as I try to run in Standalone mode as much as possible. However, Fluent does have a larger range of boundary conditions, which is useful in some instances.

I've mostly ignored ICEM tetra-prism over the years (Ansys are putting ICEM out to pasture) and I have never really tried SpaceClaim Interactive Meshing (the lack of Ansys tutorials etc. make me doubt how serious they are pushing SCIM).
siw is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 25, 2022, 06:55
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,823
Rep Power: 27
Gert-Jan will become famous soon enough
I only use fluent if my customer asks me to. Or if physics are only available in Fluent, e.g. a wavy ocean with a ship, or where I consider the modelling features better, like VOF and surface tension.

I never touched fluent meshing. Mostly, I use the ANSYS meshing. If surfaces of the 3D model are really crap such that even spaceclaim doesn't eat them (e.g. a ship hull from Rhino) I use ICEM.
Gert-Jan is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ANSYS Meshing] Defining a cell zone in ANSYS meshing for fluent Stephen Waite ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 1 July 4, 2022 09:21
[Fluent Meshing] Rotating a mesh generated with Fluent Meshing tinucci FLUENT 1 October 4, 2021 13:50
Transfer named selections from SW to Fluent Meshing the-sted FLUENT 0 May 1, 2016 23:44
Toolbars of Graphic windows in Fluent Meshing Sina.Li FLUENT 1 December 28, 2015 01:09
The fluent stopped and errors with "Emergency: received SIGHUP signal" yuyuxuan FLUENT 0 December 3, 2013 22:56


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:11.