# Icemcfd: Preventing prism inflation collisions?

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 July 31, 2007, 09:08 Icemcfd: Preventing prism inflation collisions? #1 Joe Guest   Posts: n/a http://img102.imageshack.us/img102/2982/screentm9.gif I have a geometry that varies widely in extent. I am trying to create a prism layer from one side of the geometry (A in pic). The basic idea is to set a large number of prism layers (e.g. 20) with the expectation that in the narrow portions of the geometry the prism columns will stop early due to collisions with the opposite wall ("Distorted tets" in pic). In regions of the geometry with a larger depth, the full 20-layer prism layer can be inflated without collisions. In principle this approach works with the default prism settings, creating "stair steps" to transition between the varying number of inflation layers ("stair step" in pic). However, the problem is that the prism mesher is extremely aggressive in forcing tets out of the way as it inflates. This creates very poor quality tets "squashed" up against the opposite wall (B in pic). In my full geometry, which is very intricate and complex, this "squashing" results in very poor quality tets: Quality < 1e-4 even after extensive efforts at smoothing. I have played extensively with all the prism mesher's options including the advanced prism settings to no avail. None of the available options lets me control the quality of the final "squished" tet layer. The only workaround I have come up at the moment is to manually subdivide surface "A" and manually set the maximum number of prism layers inflated on each subdivision. In this way I can ensure the final prism layer is sufficiently far away from surface B. The problem is that in a complex geometry this is an extremely tedious and cumbersome process. Does anyone know of any prism mesher tricks to achieve the following logic (in plain English): "If the current prism column front is within distance X of another non-inflating wall, stop this particular prism column" ? Ideally distance X would be some fraction of the surface mesh size on the non-inflating wall "B" e.g. 0.5-1.0. Any tricks and/or suggestions on how to achieve this?

 July 31, 2007, 09:13 Re: Icemcfd: Preventing prism inflation collisions #2 Joe Guest   Posts: n/a PS: These are the current prism settings I'm using: Min prism quality 0.1 Ortho weight 0.0 Fillet ratio 1.0 (I have tried various combos of Max height over base and Prism height limit factor.) (I have tried various combos of auto reduction, max size ratio, etc.)

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Joe CFX 16 October 10, 2011 07:06 shankar1221989 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 1 January 8, 2011 16:03 ashish agrahari Main CFD Forum 0 December 6, 2010 09:40 ashish agrahari ANSYS 7 August 11, 2010 15:51 Andreas CFX 0 January 16, 2009 12:02

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:17.