CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Mesh sensitivity study for large setups

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 28, 2022, 05:30
Default Mesh sensitivity study for large setups
  #1
Senior Member
 
Daniel
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Germany
Posts: 147
Rep Power: 9
zacko is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am doing a large centrifugal pump simulation with a suction chamber, impeller (complete) and volute. I also wanted to carry out a mesh sensitivity analysis.
But, I was wondering, if it is acceptable to use the pervious result (for example the result of the course mesh) as initial conditions for the "medium mesh".
Or, should I start every simulation from zero, which would result in a larger computational time.
Can anyone explain if this would make a big difference in the numerical results ?

Thank you and kind regards
Daniel
zacko is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2022, 15:06
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,799
Rep Power: 31
Opaque will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by zacko View Post
Hello,

I am doing a large centrifugal pump simulation with a suction chamber, impeller (complete) and volute. I also wanted to carry out a mesh sensitivity analysis.
But, I was wondering, if it is acceptable to use the pervious result (for example the result of the course mesh) as initial conditions for the "medium mesh".
Or, should I start every simulation from zero, which would result in a larger computational time.
Can anyone explain if this would make a big difference in the numerical results ?

Thank you and kind regards
Daniel
For a steady simulation (with a unique solution), the converged solution is independent of the initial conditions; therefore, you should be able to start from any known previous reasonable results. This is standard practice when dealing with complex physics.

Be certain the interpolator step is included such it can interpolate from the previous to the new mesh.

If the solution is reasonably close (converged), the computational time should decrease though that is not always the case since with mesh refinement other flow features missing in the initial values must also be converged.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
Opaque is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 29, 2022, 05:37
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Daniel
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Germany
Posts: 147
Rep Power: 9
zacko is on a distinguished road
Perfect, thank you for your response and explanation.
Thats a good point, to activate the interpolator for the mesh - didn't thought about it.
zacko is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GeometricField -> mesh() Function Tobi OpenFOAM Programming & Development 10 November 19, 2020 11:33
[Other] Difference between Mesh independance study and Mesh Sensitivity Study kunvd ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 4 September 1, 2016 21:31
[snappyHexMesh] Layers:problem with curvature giulio.topazio OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 10 August 22, 2012 09:03
[ANSYS Meshing] Any way around mesh study using mesh stats? Torque_Converter ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 5 June 4, 2012 10:07
Mesh sensitivity when using phase change models BKaus STAR-CCM+ 0 February 28, 2012 20:51


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:49.