|
[Sponsors] |
The initial transient part of the solution takes too long to fade |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 23, 2023, 11:17 |
The initial transient part of the solution takes too long to fade
|
#1 |
Member
Ashkan Kashani
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi all,
I'm doing a series of 2D transient simulations of separated and reattached flow past a sharp-edged rectangular body. According to previous recommendations on this forum, I opted to set an adaptive timestep based on a target minimum/maximum number of coefficient loops to ensure a proper temporal resolution, which leads to very small timesteps in my simulation. Despite initializing the simulation using a relevant solution previously obtained, the initial transient part of the solution appears to take a very long simulation time to fade, considering the small timesteps imposed by the adaptive timestepping. This is unfortunately beyond the computational resources available to me. I'm wondering what could be done to reach the stationary solution faster since I'm not interested in the initial transient part. Is it reasonable to manually choose a much bigger timestep? I appreciate any comments. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[solidMechanics] Support thread for "Solid Mechanics Solvers added to OpenFOAM Extend" | bigphil | OpenFOAM CC Toolkits for Fluid-Structure Interaction | 686 | December 22, 2022 09:10 |
Maximum number of iterations exceeded chtmultiregionsimpleFoam | Moncef | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 28 | July 13, 2020 14:26 |
pressure in incompressible solvers e.g. simpleFoam | chrizzl | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 13 | March 28, 2017 05:49 |
Cannot run the code properly: very large time step continuity error | crst15 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | December 14, 2014 18:17 |
[snappyHexMesh] crash sHM | H25E | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | November 10, 2014 11:27 |