|
[Sponsors] |
Heat generation due to viscosity/wall friction |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Altay
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
Hey everyone,
I doing a sensitivity analysis in turbomachinery by changing the wall roughness. I also have static wall temperatures defined as boundary conditions. I would like to calculate the heat generation (in Watts) generated due to friction and compare it to the heat flux through conduction in CFX-Post. How can I build the relation for the heat generation due to viscosity? Thanks in advance and have a nice day ![]() (Any literature would also be highly appreciated) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,741
Rep Power: 25 ![]() |
Shouldn't you just select the item "Viscous work' in CFX-Pre?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
New Member
Altay
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
Hi,
I do enable the viscous work option but that only makes the software account for it. I also want to qualitatively calculate the heat generated by friction. Herefore, I probably need the right equation to convert the shear stress force to power or dissipation. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,365
Rep Power: 139 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It might be easier to do one simulation with viscous work option activated and another simulation with it turned off. Then you can compare the results. And in CFD-Post there is a difference option which gives you the difference between two simulations which might be useful.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
New Member
Altay
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
Thank you for your answer but that might not be a reliable way for my case since I also have conduction heating and the lack of viscous work may increase the heat flux through conduction and degenerate the results.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,365
Rep Power: 139 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It depends on exactly what you are trying to do. If you want to know what difference the viscous work makes then my suggestion works well. If you want to know how much heating power is coming from viscous heating then you need a different approach.
The viscous work term is discussed in the CFX Theory Manual, in equation 1-86. Note that it is not a "shear stress force" effect as your last post suggested but a stress tensor and velocity vector effect.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
New Member
Altay
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
Yeah, I am trying to calculate how much heating power is coming from viscous heating and looking for a way.
Thanks, I will check the Theory Manual and see if I can find a way. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,688
Rep Power: 29 ![]() |
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
cfx-post, friction, heat flux, heat generation, viscosity |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Custom Thermophysical Properties | wsmith02 | OpenFOAM | 4 | June 1, 2023 14:30 |
Using PengRobinsonGas EoS with sprayFoam | Jabo | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 35 | April 29, 2022 15:35 |
Fluent Heat exchanger model | gimson | FLUENT | 0 | May 10, 2021 04:30 |
[OpenFOAM.org] Error creating ParaView-4.1.0 OpenFOAM 2.3.0 | tlcoons | OpenFOAM Installation | 13 | April 20, 2016 17:34 |
Heat Generation rate in W/m³ | ashghan | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 0 | June 27, 2014 05:42 |