|
[Sponsors] |
How to implement the work of correcting turbulence model |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 29, 2023, 11:14 |
How to implement the work of correcting turbulence model
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 4 |
I am now starting to correct the turbulence model in CFX. I have never done similar work before. I didn't find relevant information on the Internet. I don't know how to input formulas. Can anyone tell me how to get started next?Or provide some references or data.Thanks for all.
|
|
April 29, 2023, 15:52 |
|
#2 |
Member
Ashkan Kashani
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 10 |
What are you trying to achieve by modifying a turbulence model in CFX? If you intend to tune an existing eddy-viscosity model, an alternative effective approach offered by ANSYS is the GeKo model, which provides you with much flexibility to fine-tune your model without violating the model calibration for basic flows. The GeKo model can be adjusted through a number of free coefficients, each having a predictable impact on the overall behavior.
|
|
April 30, 2023, 04:52 |
|
#3 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,728
Rep Power: 143 |
Can you explain what model you are trying to implement or what you are trying to change?
The references for everything you will want to do is in the CFX documentation.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
April 30, 2023, 08:52 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 4 |
Under the low flow rate operating conditions of turbine, the flow field prediction is poor. I want to correct the turbulent kinetic energy generation term PK of the SST turbulence model. The CFX used version is 19.0 so Geko is not ok for me now.
|
|
April 30, 2023, 08:59 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 4 |
[IMG]C:\Users\58430\Downloads\0430.png[/IMG]
How to input the fomula into CEL? |
|
April 30, 2023, 18:18 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,728
Rep Power: 143 |
Your image was not attached. This FAQ describes how to attach images: https://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansy...n_the_forum.3F
It is highly unlikely that your "correction" to the equation will work without unintended consequences. Turbulence models are complicated things and unless you are a turbulence modelling expert I would not recommend trying to change them. A better approach, if a certain region has too much production and therefore too much turbulence, is simply to use a source term to take a bit of the turbulent energy away. This does not involve adjusting anything on the turbulence models, can be properly linearised so it converges, and based on what you describe would achieve what you want.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[GUIDE] Switching turbulence model to SpalartAllmaras | gabrielfelix | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | March 24, 2022 20:19 |
New turbulence model in OpenFOAM 5 with porosity scalar | shinjanghosh | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 0 | January 15, 2020 00:06 |
Centrifugal fan-reverse flow in outlet lesds to a mass in flow field | xiexing | CFX | 3 | March 29, 2017 10:00 |
Implement new Turbulence Model | sven | OpenFOAM | 0 | July 19, 2009 15:47 |
Why Turbulence models are not universal. | Senthil | Main CFD Forum | 4 | July 5, 2000 04:34 |