|
[Sponsors] |
February 28, 2024, 05:56 |
Radial bearing force - CFX and Fluent
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Jiri
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 218
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi there,
I encountered the following issue: I am simulating a radial bearing. The geometry is simple: cylindrical region with radially shifted inner wall to obtain eccentricity. This region includes inlet pipe. All meshed together in ICEM as hexa mesh. Based on theory for given shaft speed and lubrication gap, the radial force is independent on density, because pressure force and viscous force are dominant, thus density goes away. This behaviour was confirmed in Fluent, I computed density 1000 kg/m3, 1 kg/m3 and 0.0001 kg/m3, and the force (Fx^2 + Fy^2)^0.5 is almost same, the results deviate negligibly. But when computing this in CFX, I have different results for density 1000 and 1. The difference is more than 200%-300%.. !! The results however get closer for density 1 and 0.0001. I verified the influence of reference pressure and others.... no idea yet. Computations run in CFX and Fluent are as follows: double precision, laminar, incompressible, isothermal, isoviscous... Thanks a lot.. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fluent Meshing for CFX opinions | siw | CFX | 1 | April 25, 2022 06:55 |
CFX vs. FLUENT | turbo | CFX | 4 | April 13, 2021 08:08 |
Comparison of fluent and CFX for turbomachinery | Far | CFX | 52 | December 26, 2014 18:11 |
Different result in CFX and fluent for mass trans.? is segregated better? | ftab | CFX | 7 | September 27, 2012 07:57 |
CFX or Fluent for Turbo machinery ? | Far | FLUENT | 3 | May 27, 2011 03:02 |