|
[Sponsors] |
September 18, 2008, 15:02 |
CFX-Post Variables
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have discovered what appears to be an inconsistency between the Velocity variables in CFX-Post. I assume that: Velocity = sqrt[(Velocity u)^2 + (Velocity v)^2 + (Velocity w)^2]
Using either areaAve or massFlowAve I get the following data: areaAve( Velocity u ) 8606.64 [ ft min^-1 ] areaAve( Velocity v ) 80.62 [ ft min^-1 ] areaAve( Velocity w ) -213.75 [ ft min^-1 ] areaAve( Velocity ) 9738.15 [ ft min^-1 ] However, calculation of the magnitude using the formula above gives a value of: 8609.67 [ft min^-1]. Strangely the areaAve Velocity value of 9738.15 [ft min^-1] is closer to the expected velocity of 9620 [ft min^-1] based on the flow area and the u-direction mass flow rate boundary condition I've applied. Does anyone have an explanation for this? I haven't been able to find a mathematical definition for Velocity in the CFX documentation. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Variable in CFX Post | Ben | CFX | 9 | June 20, 2012 18:10 |
chart for transiente simulation - CFX Post | rogbrito | CFX | 0 | June 22, 2009 12:12 |
Assign new variable in CFX Post | Ben | CFX | 1 | August 25, 2008 14:59 |
CFX definitions of Rotating Variables: Confusing! | Prakash | CFX | 0 | November 8, 2005 01:24 |
CFX POST mpeg Revisited | henry | CFX | 2 | November 22, 2002 11:42 |