|
[Sponsors] |
Domain Reference Pressure and mass flow inlet boundary |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#61 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 21 ![]() |
Thta would be really interesting to know that if Total pressure B.C is used in such a simulation (one inlet, no outlet and moving wall) then from the solver will get the information about the velocities?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 |
Senior Member
Lance
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 669
Rep Power: 23 ![]() |
I dont get it. What is your question/problem?
You have a single inlet, no outlet and a domain that changes in size? Given an incompressible fluid you must have a flow rate at the inlet, which is determined by the time rate of change of domain volume. If the flow rate is wrong (compared to what?) then your domain volume change (wall motion) is changing too slow or fast. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 21 ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 | |
Senior Member
Lance
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 669
Rep Power: 23 ![]() |
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 21 ![]() |
Ok. But in reality the flow enters at particular pressure and mass flow rate which generates pressure inside domain and this generated pressures forces the domian walls to move for a particular distance in a particular time. Can this be modelled? If yes how?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
Senior Member
Lance
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 669
Rep Power: 23 ![]() |
Yes,
either with a coupling to a solid solver ("2-way" FSI) or using the generated pressures and knowledge about how much displacement that would result in, prescribe the displament using a CEL expression. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#67 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 21 ![]() |
I am already specifying the displacement on the walls using expression (using d = V*t) but I know only the pressure at the Inlet. Thr purpose of the simulation is to determine the presure loss of flow till it reaches the displaced surfaces/moving walls. So what could be done in this case?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#68 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 21 ![]() |
Quote:
Purpose is to study the pressure losses till the flow reaches the lifting surface/moving walls. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#69 |
Senior Member
Lance
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 669
Rep Power: 23 ![]() |
If you prescribe the motion by d = v*t (assuming v is velocity?) then I assume you know the velocity the wall moving with? Then, if the mass flow at the inlet is too low/high, then this velocity is too low/high.
If the goal of your model is to get the pressure drop from inlet to moving wall, then I would run a bunch of simulations with different prescribed displacement velocities and check the mass flow rate and pressure drop. You can prescribe the motion of a surface as a function of almost anything, including pressure, force, etc. Use CEL expressions (e.g. areaAve(pressure)@surface). Of course this would require knowledge about mass, external forces, etc. In earlier versions of CFX (v11 maybe?) there used to be a good example of how this was solved on a ball check valve, but it has now been replaced by the rigid body solver. Anyway, it sounds like you need to take a step back and think through what you are interested in and what you are actually modelling. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#70 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 21 ![]() |
Quote:
BTW i am using the following expression for the mesh displacement Code:
0.0125*t In the domain settings under "Mesh Deformation" i am using "Displacement Rel. To = Previous Mesh" and then for moving walls under "Mesh Motion" i am using the "Specified Displacement" and specifying the displacement using the expression above. Is it correct? In the modelling guide of CFX i read about "Mesh Motion" and "Specified Displacement" options there its written " If the Use Mesh From option is set to Initial Values, be careful with restarts because the definition of the initial mesh may have changed." Where I can find this option "Use Mesh From"? I made several restarts but didn't change anything but I think mesh is still moving correctly. Mesh_Motion_Options.jpg Also what's the difference between "Specified Displacement" and "Specified Location" Mesh Motion options? If I have the displacement equation (mentioned above) I should be using "Specified Displacement" right? Sorry if i am asking a lot of questions but this is my first experience with moving mesh simulations and i am still in the learning process. Last edited by cfd seeker; August 16, 2018 at 18:11. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#71 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,922
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As you are new to moving mesh I would suggest you do a simpler model first to get started. As you know the motion of the actuator, that means you know the flow rate it generates. So remove the actuator and the moving mesh and replace it with an outlet with a mass flow rate from the actuator. This is a simple steady state inlet/outlet simulation with no moving mesh and should be quite easy to do. You should also be able to get this quite accurate relatively easily, so will give you a good starting point to work from.
Once you have this simple model working well then try the more ambitious moving mesh version. As you develop the moving mesh you will then be able to compare against the simple model to check the results are reasonable.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#72 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 21 ![]() |
Quote:
![]() Can you please clarify my confusions from the last post? |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#73 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,922
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Specified location and Specified displacement: Let's say you have a mesh at x=1m and you want it to move right 0.1m at 1m/s. This can be defined by:
Specified Displacement = 0.1[m]*t or Specified Location = 1.0[m] + 0.1[m]*t So the difference is whether it is the displacement from the initial position or the absolute position. Check how much your mesh has moved to check it moved the distance you intended.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#74 | |
Senior Member
Lance
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 669
Rep Power: 23 ![]() |
Quote:
This also resolves into a single value, but all points on the surface will be displaced by that value. Probably what you want. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#75 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 21 ![]() |
Thanks Glenn and Lance,
i understood the difference but the units of following expression is confusing me Code:
Specified Displacement = 0.1[m]*t When you say if we want the mesh to move right by 0.1m with 1m/s. Then the expression shouldn't be Displacement = Velocity*Time? Code:
Specified Displacement = 1[m/s]*t ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#76 |
Senior Member
Lance
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 669
Rep Power: 23 ![]() |
Well, since displacement is a length that is obviously a typo.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wind turbine simulation | Saturn | CFX | 60 | July 17, 2024 06:45 |
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 06:21 |
RPM in Wind Turbine | Pankaj | CFX | 9 | November 23, 2009 05:05 |
Convective Heat Transfer - Heat Exchanger | Mark | CFX | 6 | November 15, 2004 16:55 |
New topic on same subject - Flow around race car | Tudor Miron | CFX | 15 | April 2, 2004 07:18 |