CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

NO model vs post processing in coal combustion,CFX

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 12, 2011, 15:40
Default NO model vs post processing in coal combustion,CFX
Sara S.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 16
sakalido is on a distinguished road

I am modeling coal combustion in a reactor with swirl flow and I want to analyze the amount of NOx emission in the outlet of my reactor.
I have used fuel gas oxygen reactions, not the HCN NO PDF ones, and used post processing. but the amount of mass fraction of NO in the outlet is not added to the summation of mass fraction of all species in the outlet. meaning that = 0.67, sum(all mass fractions including NO)=1.67, sum(all mass fractions excluding NO)=1.
So I thought maybe this method is the wrong way and there there might be another way to consider NO analysis as the main reactions while solving not in post processing.
In the tutorial for coal combustion, I see the post processing is used to study NO mass fractions and in the can combustor tutorial, NO model is used in terms of using CFX library and HCN NO PDF reactions without any post processing.
My question is are these two, post processing and NO model, two different methods in CFX? which one is more accurate and you suggest to use?

Thank you
sakalido is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2011, 14:07
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Europe
Posts: 169
Rep Power: 17
joey2007 is on a distinguished road
The post-processor solves the same transport equation after momentum, enthalpy etc. It is one-way coupled. So, if there is no feedback, it should be okay.

Thermal NO is the classic example. I have much experience with gaseous combustion, lesser with coal. So, I can give no final recommendation. You may just try both and compare.
Please do not forget: I am not paid for answering your questions.

Thousands of issues can cause a division by zero. Please do not capture a thread, with the argument: "I have the same issue ...."
joey2007 is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 18 March 3, 2015 05:36
Nonpremixed Combustion Model for Coal Gasification C.Y.Ler FLUENT 2 April 29, 2014 08:51
Problem with Non-Premixed model (coal burner) Nando FLUENT 0 June 4, 2007 10:44
How get the CO fraction in coal Gibb model Leo s CFX 0 July 30, 2006 19:37
post processing in CFD MANISH BHARGAVA Main CFD Forum 0 October 17, 1998 20:51

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:29.