CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Visualization & Post-Processing Software > EnSight

Local Nusselt Number analysis in structured Pipes

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 11, 2023, 08:53
Question Local Nusselt Number analysis in structured Pipes
New Member
Max E.
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Mpee93 is on a distinguished road
Hello together,

I am analysing a rib-structured pipe flow with heated walls with constant Heat flux in ensight. The CFD was done in fluent in a transient RSM-BSL model at Re=50000 with periodic boundary conditions over 1 rib. Note that the image attached shows 2 ribs, this is only a periodic condition set in ensight, the flowfiled was calculated over only one instance.

One topic of analysis is maxima and minima as well as local Nusselt Number distribution. I am working of the definition for the Nusselt Number Nu=\frac{\partial T*}{\partial y*}_{y=0}. T* given as T*=\frac{T_{wall}-T}{T_{wall}-T_{ref}} . As my pipe is short i used T_inlet as T_ref. y* is given as y*=\frac{y}{D_{pipe}}. However, as the ribs have a complex surface, the relevant direction for the Heat flux will not always be \partial y* (see attached image).

I have computed the wall normal vector field, as they should be the relevant directions for Heat Flux. I tried to then map the cartesian temperature gradient to the Wall normal vector field usign dot WallNormalVector. This brings me into the issue of my Nusselt Number being of the dimension \frac{1}{m}. I realize the Wall normal vector field needs to be normalised by a characteristic length, but struggle to understand if the diameter of the pipe is appropriate, given the normal vector field isnt simply in radial direction. Any clarification for this would be very appreciated.

Additionally, the values for NU I am receiving are way too large, and sometimes also negative. This seems impossible for a wall with constant heat flux. When evaluating the global Nusselt Number via the averaged wall temperature as \overline{Nu}=\frac{\dot{q}*D_{pipe}}{\lambda_{0}*(T_{Wall}-T_{ref})}* I receive something in the Order of \overline{Nu}\approx 600. The maxima and minima for the local one however range from -115000 to 20000.

I am not clear if T* needs to be defined different when evaluating the local Nusselt number compared to the global Nusselt Number, as in plugging the local wall temperature into the definition vs. the averaged one.

I am also unsure If I need to convert my cartesian Temperature gradient into a cylindrical one before proceeding. This should clear up any issues of the sign of the gradient changing depending on if its on the top or the bottom of the pipe.

Thank you for your patience and for reading through my wall of text, I hope someone can give me an insight where I am stuck.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CFD online.jpg (97.8 KB, 0 views)

Last edited by Mpee93; August 11, 2023 at 09:04. Reason: Latex Syntax
Mpee93 is offline   Reply With Quote


calculus, heat tranfer, nusselt calculation, structured pipe

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Decomposing meshes Tobi OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 22 February 24, 2023 09:23
pimpleDyMFoam computation randomly stops babapeti OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 5 January 24, 2018 05:28
[mesh manipulation] Importing Multiple Meshes thomasnwalshiii OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 18 December 19, 2015 18:57
dynamic Mesh is faster than MRF???? sharonyue OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 14 August 26, 2013 07:47
Upgraded from Karmic Koala 9.10 to Lucid Lynx10.04.3 bookie56 OpenFOAM Installation 8 August 13, 2011 04:03

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:35.