CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT > Fluent Multiphase

fixed bed reactor

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 7, 2015, 03:40
Smile fixed bed reactor
  #1
Member
 
Liam
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 12
Many is on a distinguished road
Hello Multiphase friends!

I am beginning with my research in multiphase flow simulation of a fixed bed reactor. I have a tube where flow a liquid and a solid particles dilute on it will be passing trough. In the tube I have a bed of solid particles as well, with a fixed fraction. I would like to study hydrodynamics of these system, mainly pressure drop and liquid holdup.

I have read several scientific literature about packed/fixed/trickle beds. There exist several approachs that seems to provide accurate results regarding aerodynamics behaviour.

I have tried to model my problem with several strategies:

1. Triphase flow using Eulerian approach, assuming that solid particles are fixed inside the tube (granular phase with packed bed option enabled and also fixed velocities for the solid granular phase)

2. Biphase flow, using the same approach but in this case granular phase is modeled using porous media approach (I have computed my inertial and viscous coefficients based on concentration of solid particles and diameter as well, using Blake-Kozeny equations)

3. Single phase flow, using species transports (liquid phase, with two species, liquid and dilute solid particles) and porous media in order to model the fixed bed.

I am quite surprised about the results. I realised that:

a. Presure drop varies a lot between models 1 and 3 and model 2 (by an order of magnitude). Differences between models 1 and 3 are lower, but also noticiable (pressure drop from 3 Pa to almost 6 Pa)

b. Velocity profile is almost the same in the three models.

c. Contours of solid dilute shows and evolution in triphase simulations with time. In the other two models, both fluids seems to be much mixed and evolution is not easy to distinguish.

So, please, let me know your thoughts about:

-Which model better represents my problem (1,2 or 3)?
-Are the differences between models reasonable?
-I have used fixed velocities for all zones for fixed bed particles. Is this the better strategy to maintain fixed the solid particles in a zone?

Thanks to all the experts that spend time helping beginners!

Cheers,

Many
Many is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 16, 2018, 11:41
Default Similar problem
  #2
New Member
 
Camila
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 11
mila.d.b is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I am starting some simulations in a packed bed (liquid-solid), Eulerian model. I am having problems with convergence when I try to increase the time step (I need to simulate around 3.000 s of flow. So using a time step of 0.01 s is not feasible. Do you have any tips and tricks to get that done?

Thanks

Camila
mila.d.b is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 12, 2018, 21:30
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Mehul Parmar
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: India
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 9
mehul020892 is on a distinguished road
Take adaptive time steps and reduced convergence criteria . Also you can use quick scheme.
mehul020892 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
discrete element method for fixed bed student2008 FLUENT 0 July 9, 2015 09:16
Need guidance and tips about a fluidized bed reactor gasifier simulation cmigueis OpenFOAM 2 April 22, 2015 08:54
[GAMBIT] geometry of fixed bed amin_67323 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 0 August 19, 2014 06:53
Fixed bed reactor.....you can help...I am sure!! Amrrefay FLUENT 0 June 6, 2009 06:58
Fixed Bed Combustion Stanley FLUENT 21 March 22, 2001 10:18


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:22.