can UDF change the boundary type or turbulence model?

hotin87 · January 28, 2015, 22:15

Hi,

I am trying to change the turbulence model I am using depending on the flow speed. For example, I want to use a laminar model when flow speed is 0, and a realizable k-e model when the flow speed is 4 m/s. If possible, how can we do that through UDF?

upeksa · January 29, 2015, 08:12

It is not possible by UDF. It might be possible by an interaction scheme-UDF, but it seems quite complex.

I can't help you, I don't know a lot about scheme.

Anyway, what you are trying, if it is possible and you can implement it, I think that I will not be numerically stable, besides it does not make sense to me.

If I where you, I would check in your ANSYS Fluent manual the chapter called "How do I choose my turbulent model", for further information.

hotin87 · January 29, 2015, 10:23

Do you think it would be numerically unstable if I keep changing the models? But if the real condition is like a process have both larminar and turbulent flows at different time, would it be OK if I just use the turbulence model?

Quote:

Originally Posted by upeksa

It is not possible by UDF. It might be possible by an interaction scheme-UDF, but it seems quite complex.

I can't help you, I don't know a lot about scheme.

Anyway, what you are trying, if it is possible and you can implement it, I think that I will not be numerically stable, besides it does not make sense to me.

If I where you, I would check in your ANSYS Fluent manual the chapter called "How do I choose my turbulent model", for further information.

pakk · January 30, 2015, 04:23

Doesn't the turbulent model give nearly similar results as the laminar model when you apply it to a laminar situation?

In that case I would just use the turbulent model everywhere. You will use some unnecessary computation time on calculating the (small) turbulence in the laminar zones, but I would not worry about that.

hotin87 · January 30, 2015, 11:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by pakk

Doesn't the turbulent model give nearly similar results as the laminar model when you apply it to a laminar situation?

In that case I would just use the turbulent model everywhere. You will use some unnecessary computation time on calculating the (small) turbulence in the laminar zones, but I would not worry about that.

The results are different, I don't understand why. I thought in the turbulence model, when velocity is low, there are some mechanism that can depress the turbulence model. But it looks it's not like that.

The attached figure show the difference. It plots the temperature, the upper one is using a laminar model, the lower one is using a turbulence model. The velocity is 0. All the other boundary conditions are the same.

Untitled.jpg

ghost82 · January 30, 2015, 16:28

Did you try the rng k-epsilon?

hotin87 · January 30, 2015, 18:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by ghost82

Did you try the rng k-epsilon?

I see, the correct initial value of k and e seems very important, I used 1 as the initial value before. Looks like that is not correct.

January 28, 2015, 22:15	can UDF change the boundary type or turbulence model?	#1
hotin87 New Member Haoting Wang Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Virginia Posts: 19 Rep Power: 11	Hi, I am trying to change the turbulence model I am using depending on the flow speed. For example, I want to use a laminar model when flow speed is 0, and a realizable k-e model when the flow speed is 4 m/s. If possible, how can we do that through UDF?

January 30, 2015, 16:28		#6
ghost82 Senior Member Rick Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 1,016 Rep Power: 27	Did you try the rng k-epsilon? __________________ Google is your friend and the same for the search button!

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
inlet pressure is higher than outlet pressure for fan	sivakumar	OpenFOAM Pre-Processing	16	December 30, 2017 15:16
Simulation won't show turbulence	pete_87	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	4	June 25, 2014 12:35
T Junction Stability	ignacio	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	5	May 2, 2013 11:44
[swak4Foam] Air Conditioned room groovyBC	Sebaj	OpenFOAM Community Contributions	7	October 31, 2012 15:16
[Commercial meshers] Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues	michele	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	2	July 15, 2005 05:15

January 29, 2015, 08:12		#2
upeksa Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 80 Rep Power: 13	It is not possible by UDF. It might be possible by an interaction scheme-UDF, but it seems quite complex. I can't help you, I don't know a lot about scheme. Anyway, what you are trying, if it is possible and you can implement it, I think that I will not be numerically stable, besides it does not make sense to me. If I where you, I would check in your ANSYS Fluent manual the chapter called "How do I choose my turbulent model", for further information.

January 30, 2015, 04:23		#4
pakk Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Posts: 1,965 Rep Power: 27	Doesn't the turbulent model give nearly similar results as the laminar model when you apply it to a laminar situation? In that case I would just use the turbulent model everywhere. You will use some unnecessary computation time on calculating the (small) turbulence in the laminar zones, but I would not worry about that.