|
[Sponsors] |
unsteady behavior for a scalar with non-temporal source definition and steady BC? |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
ali
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 318
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Hi everyone,
I have defined a source term for a scalar that is not a function of time and the boundary conditions are also steady while, for some reason, the simulation is transient. The results show that this particular scalar has transient behavior while, as I said, the boundary condition and the source term do not have temporal terms. What could be the reason? Thanks, Ali |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Alexander
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,259
Rep Power: 33 ![]() ![]() |
you may try to calculate it only once, on the first time step
best regards |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
ali
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 318
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
I will do it and let you know what will happen.
But wouldn't it get transported downstream if the source is turned-off after the first time-step? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Alexander
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,259
Rep Power: 33 ![]() ![]() |
if under scalar you mean uds variable, than there should be no problem with such approach.
Once you calculate it, uds will store data. Best regards |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
scalar, source, source term, transport, uds |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fire and smoke modeling | CFDST | CFX | 84 | April 30, 2019 07:01 |
Implicit Unsteady Tending to Steady Solution | Muzz | STAR-CCM+ | 2 | September 21, 2015 11:56 |
GETVAR Error in Multiband Monte Carlo Radiation Simulation with Directional Source | silvan | CFX | 3 | June 16, 2014 09:49 |
how to predict unsteady flow from case definition? | Felix | Main CFD Forum | 6 | August 28, 2007 16:40 |