|
[Sponsors] |
DEFINE_DPM_DRAG - fluid phase velocity correction |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 4 ![]() |
Hi!
A Lagrangian (one-way) tracking is used to model submicron particle dispersion and deposition in a turbulent channel flow. The discrete random walk (DRW) model in Fluent gives bad results for submicron particles, so I want to implement a fluctuating correction to the fluid phase velocity in the DEFINE_DPM_DRAG macro: u = ![]() Here: c->V[i] = ![]() p->Vprime[i] = u' // modelled with the DRW I call the fluid phase velocity and change it like this: cphase_state_t *c = &(p->cphase[0]); for (i=0; i<dim; i++) c->V[i] += p->Vprime[i] ; (Equation *) Based on this velocity a new particle Reynolds number is found, and 18*Cd*Re/24 is returned. Then to my question: In what way has equation* changed the cell velocity (u_cell = c->V[i]) and the velocity field? 1) Just for this timestep? In that case, u in the Lagrangian tracking equation includes the modeled fluctuating velocity: d/dt(v_p) = F_D (u-v_p) (Equation **) Here, F_D = mu/(rho_p*d_p^2)*(18*Cd*Re/24). 2) Only inside the DEFINE_DPM_DRAG drag? u, in equation **, is not affected by the velocity correction. 3) For the whole simulation? The velocity field is changing during the simulation because of fluctuating velocity corrections from all the particles. In other words, is this cell velocity (c->V[i]) called in the Lagrangian tracking equation? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
define_dpm_drag, discrete phase model, discrete random walk, lagrangian particles, udf |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[OLAFLOW] The OLAFLOW Thread | Phicau | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 440 | March 2, 2023 08:54 |
Question about adaptive timestepping | Guille1811 | CFX | 25 | November 12, 2017 18:38 |
Difficulty in calculating angular velocity of Savonius turbine simulation | alfaruk | CFX | 14 | March 17, 2017 07:08 |
Error in Two phase (condensation) modeling | adilsyyed | CFX | 15 | June 24, 2015 20:42 |
Velocity profile disturbance due to loss coefficient | rks171 | Main CFD Forum | 3 | May 25, 2012 18:30 |