|
[Sponsors] |
STANDARD WALL FUNCTIONS vs ENHANCED WALL TREATMENT |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 22, 2013, 13:09 |
STANDARD WALL FUNCTIONS vs ENHANCED WALL TREATMENT
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi everybody,
I'm simulating with fluent the natural ventilation in a building, so I've realized a mesh of a cubic building with a window, which is surrounded by a parallelepiped representing the external air. I've had to refine the mesh in some zones, as those close to the building walls and to the parallelepiped basis. The mesh is that of the attached image. I've a doubt about the near-wall treatment. First I've set k-epsilon RNG with standard wall function. Setting the Yplus of the building walls and the basis of the parallelepiped (which is considered as a rough wall) I've obtained Y+ include between about zero and a 700. Now, I don't know how to proceed, becouse I should coarsen the mesh in those zones where Y+ are less than 30 and refine the mesh whare Y+ are more than 300. Is it right? I know that Fluent can just refine the mesh and not coarsen it. So, what can I do? Thanks a lot. Bests Last edited by Roby_1986; February 24, 2013 at 11:52. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
y plus and standard wall functions | spk | FLUENT | 12 | January 22, 2018 17:30 |
Enhanced Wall Treatment - Thermal Effects | Brian Tang | FLUENT | 1 | November 5, 2015 23:59 |
[ICEM] Export ICEM mesh to Gambit / Fluent | romekr | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | November 26, 2011 12:11 |
standard wall functions | Irshad22 | Main CFD Forum | 0 | December 20, 2010 06:11 |
Errors running allwmake in OpenFOAM141dev with WM_COMPILE_OPTION%3ddebug | unoder | OpenFOAM Installation | 11 | January 30, 2008 20:30 |