
[Sponsors] 
March 8, 2013, 06:12 
Having Problem solving 2D supersonic flow around a plug nozzle

#1 
New Member
chrislloyd
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 6 
Hi,
I am trying to solve a supersonic compressible flow around a "aerospike plug nozzle" at a particular altitude in fluent. Here are the conditions being used: Model:  Energy: On  Viscous: Inviscid Materials  Air  Density: Ideal Gas  Cp: 1286.68 j/kgk  Molecular Weight: 37.23 kg/kgmol The mesh is divided in 4 fluids fluid zones, first 3 existing till the end of the plug and the 4th one being the rest of the domain. Boundary Conditions:  Inlet(Mass flow Inlet)  Mass flow rate: 3.25757 kg/s  initial gauge pressure: 2045430 N/m^2  Total Stagnation pressure (P0): 1577.826k  Direction specification: Normal to Boundary There exist 3 far field pressures having the following conditions:  Gauge Pressure: 64434 pascal  Mach Number: 2.804  Axial flow direction: 1  Radial flow direction: 0  Temperature(K): 264.4k  Pressure Outlet:  Gauge Pressure: 64434 pascal  Backflow direction specification method: Normal To Boundary  Backflow total temperature(T0): 482.689 Operating Condition: 0 pascal Solution Method used:  Implicit  Second Order Upwind  Flux type: RoeFDS Solution Controls:  Courant Number: 1  Limits have been increased for temperature and pressure Solution Initialization:  Standard Initialization  Compute from mass flow inlet  Reference frame: Absolute THE PROBLEM: The main problem am facing is.. the mesh file is huge (triangular mesh  100,000+ cells) There is divergence after about 15k + iterations. What message it shows is that due to sudden temperature change the timestep is reduced and courant number is also being reduced to 0.000xxx something and it iterates. After one iteration it shows the same message again but now it further reduces the courant number. I have tried using Explicit solver with courant number at 0.1 and it yields the same result i have also tried both implicit and explicit with ASUM solver but the same result RESULT INTERPRETATION: What i feel is that the sudden temp change across a shockwave is too much for fluent to compute (i maybe wrong) but can anyone point out what the problem might be ?? or what can be done for it?? Thanks a Lot. 

March 8, 2013, 18:38 

#2 
Senior Member

Hi chrislloyd,
I think one quick way of doing is to use ramp_up approach. you can start your computation with smaller mach number and then after let us say whatever 500 iterations changed to slightly higher Mach number until you reached to your required Mach number. The second one is to use a very small Courant number before even starting the computation may be 0.05 or similar. Start with 1st order AUSM upwind scheme and then after some 100 or 1000 iterations switch to 2nd order AUSM upwind. Hope this helps. regards and good luck. 

March 9, 2013, 16:26 
dear

#3 
Member
farzadpourfattah
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 6 
in some reference book of CFd, we can see this recommendation that:
Don't use mass flow inlet condition for ideal gas. try to set pressure inlet and pressure outlet. use gas dynamics handbook to satisfy your mass flow rate with difference of inlet and outlet pressure. 

March 11, 2013, 15:17 

#4  
New Member
chrislloyd
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 6 
Quote:
but @64344 pressure and 2.8 mach number i have tried different variations with the ramp up approach, but every time (even after increasing the limits) it says "time step reduced in xxx cells due to excessive temperature change" i read online that if this happens for high speed flow you should reduce the "positivity rate limit" to 0.05 or 0.02. but even then it diverges. Any idea what can be done? 

March 11, 2013, 15:18 

#5  
New Member
chrislloyd
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 6 
Quote:
Thank You 

March 12, 2013, 16:32 
Dear

#6 
Member
farzadpourfattah
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 6 
In our cfd group, we cannot converge solution ideal gas with mass flow inlet condition, If you can run with mass flow boundary condition for ideal gas please tell me.


March 17, 2013, 20:59 

#7 
New Member
chrislloyd
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 6 
Sorry for the late reply, what would "run with mass flow boundary condition for ideal gas" mean?? i am still working on the problem


July 22, 2015, 13:09 

#8  
New Member
NY
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 4 
Quote:
I am working on simillar design of Aerospike nozzle in Ansys Fluent. my profile is based on MOC and pressure inlet and oulet boundary conditions. But i am still facing simillar problems as your.. Did you figure out , what was the problem. Requesting to help me out. Regards Mehlam 

Tags 
2d flow, compressible flow, fluent, nozzle, shockwave 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Velocity blows up suddenly after 30,000+ iterations  lordvon  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  15  October 19, 2015 13:52 
pimpleFoam: turbulence>correct(); is not executed when using residualControl  hfs  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  3  October 29, 2013 09:35 
Interfoam blows on parallel run  danvica  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  16  December 22, 2012 03:09 
Floating point exception error  Alan  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  10  April 6, 2012 14:02 
Could anybody help me see this error and give help  liugx212  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  3  January 4, 2006 19:07 