|
[Sponsors] | |||||
Volume Flow Rate and Area * Velocity values different |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
Hello,
I have a fluent model, where the fluid is of constant density. Structured mesh, well converged. But the volume flow rate what fluent shows is different when I multiply the area and area weighted average of velocity magnitude. Did not understand ? Why ? (Volume Flow Rate) Fluent != (Area) fluent * (Area weighted average of velocity magnitude) fluent Thanks in advance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 28 ![]() |
Is it multiphase?
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
No .... the fluid is air
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 28 ![]() |
That sounds strange... How much do they differ?
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 28 ![]() |
Ahh maybe this:
What do you integrate for the "Area weighted average of velocity magnitude"? You need to integrate only the perpendicular (to the surface) component of the velocity vector - not the length of the complete velocity vector!
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
|
I tried with Velocity magnitude, X, Y and Z velocities .... still they differ.
When I calculate velocity = (volume flow rate/area) fluent and area weighted avg of (velocity magnitude/X-vel/Y-vel/Z-vel), both differ by almost 4-5m/s |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 28 ![]() |
But this isn't what I wrote:
You need the perpendicular velocity component. If your surface is no "simple" cartesian surface, the cartesian (x,y,z) components won't help you. What you need is "A dot v"!
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
|
It is a simple rectangular surface. So don't you think the velocity magnitude is normal to that ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 28 ![]() |
Not necessarily... Why don't you post pictures?
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
|
Let the normal of the rectangle be [nx, ny, nz], and the area-weighted average of x-,y-,z- velocity be [U, V, W], then (U*nx + V*ny + W*nz) should not be differ much from the volumetric flow rate divided by the area.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
|
Thanks !
Will do that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 7 ![]() |
Hi
I am stuck with the same problem now. See attached the image of my model. I am trying to calculate the volume flow through this room. But the 2 methods are giving different answers. I am not sure if I understand it correctly. Any suggestion/help? Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mass flow rate: calculation v/s computation | beguxa | FLUENT | 5 | December 2, 2018 22:02 |
| Water subcooled boiling | Attesz | CFX | 7 | January 5, 2013 04:32 |
| Finding volume flow rate through a car | wh88 | FLUENT | 0 | September 23, 2011 15:12 |
| Constant flow rate through a small area inside the fluid domain. | robingilbert | OpenFOAM | 7 | October 4, 2010 17:19 |
| ATTENTION! Reliability problems in CFX 5.7 | Joseph | CFX | 14 | April 20, 2010 16:45 |