CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Modeling gas expansion in vacuum

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 19, 2014, 11:46
Post Modeling gas expansion in vacuum
  #1
New Member
 
rcd
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
cryonole is on a distinguished road
I am new to FLUENT and want to know if gas expansion in a vacuum tube can be modeled using it. The geometry is similar to a shock-tube but with a state of vacuum in the 'driven' section and finite pressure in the 'driver' section. I want to determine the transient pressure/density/velocity field in the tube when the diaphragm separating the finite pressure and vacuum sides is suddenly ruptured.
cryonole is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 21, 2014, 04:41
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
RodriguezFatz's Avatar
 
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 26
RodriguezFatz will become famous soon enough
Did you think about whether CFD is capable of doing this at all? I mean, if you have a (nearly-) vacuum on one side the Knudsen number will be pretty high there. Maybe CFD equations aren't valid there...
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower.
RodriguezFatz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 21, 2014, 10:19
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,965
Rep Power: 26
pakk will become famous soon enough
I think you can model it, and the results will be reasonably reliable.
RodriguezFatz is correct, if it is really vacuum on one end, then the continuum hypothesis fails there, and your equations will be incorrect. But because the majority of the mass will be in the region where the continuum hypothesis is valid, your results will generally be OK-ish. How good it is, depends on what you want to get out of your model. If you want to know the shockwaves that go back into your high-density part, you are safe, I think. If you want to see exactly what happens on the front of the shockwave into the vacuum part, you will not get a good answer. The order of magnitude of the shockwave velocity will be correct, but can be off by 50%.

Some parts of your transient pressure/density/velocity field will be accurate, some will not. In general, the parts in the vacuum will be less accurate.

If you want to simulate this in Fluent, make sure to use the density-based solver.
pakk is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
expansion, fluent 12.0, vacuum

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out saii CFX 12 March 19, 2018 05:21
error message cuteapathy CFX 14 March 20, 2012 06:45
Constant velocity of the material Sas CFX 15 July 13, 2010 08:56
modeling gas expansion queequeg FLUENT 0 June 19, 2010 01:04
Gas pressure question Dan Moskal Main CFD Forum 0 October 24, 2002 22:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:49.