CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Cannot get similar results based on two methods of friction factor calculation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 14, 2016, 10:37
Default Cannot get similar results based on two methods of friction factor calculation
New Member
Dantong Shi
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 10
lion1990 is on a distinguished road

I'm using periodic conditions in Fluent with specify mass flow rate to calculate a single phase laminar flow with heat transfer. After simulation, I want to calculate the Fanning friction factor. I'm using the following two methods:

1. Based on shear stress. I used the area averaged shear stress T (constant density) from the fluent report. f = T/(0.5*density*velocity^2).

2. Based on pressure gradient. After calculation, the periodic conditions panel would give the pressure gradient dp/dx. And f=-dp/dx*dh/(2*density*velocity^2).

But I got very different results from this two methods. The result of the second one is about two times than the first one. It should be similar.

My geometry is a sinusoid wavy fin in 2D. I also tried my simulation in a flat plate, and it doesn't show this problem.

My geometry is in the attachment.
Attached Images
File Type: png Geometry.png (2.9 KB, 7 views)
lion1990 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 14, 2016, 22:40
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,665
Rep Power: 65
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Make sure you've properly integrated the shear stress.

The proper length scale in 3D (usually the hydraulic diameter Dh) is not quite the same in 2D.

The best way to check is to apply a force balance to relate the wall shear stress to the bulk pressure gradient and then compare that to what you have for friction factor. It is critical that the correct length scale is chosen to ensure the force balance holds.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote


fluent, friction factor, periodic condition, pressure gradient, shear stress

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any questions about Runge-Kutta methods Runge_Kutta Main CFD Forum 33 September 9, 2019 16:32
Comparing Air numerical results with water experimental results cristian2009es Main CFD Forum 1 July 2, 2014 18:11
Sanity check: different nMoles in thermophysicalProperties similar results for 2 runs massive_turbulence OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 May 6, 2014 17:51
Wall function mesh vs y+=1 mesh gives similar results NickFSI STAR-CCM+ 0 March 12, 2013 05:35
Different results from similar quality cfx and ICEM meshes Nick R CFX 3 January 17, 2011 07:48

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:06.