|
[Sponsors] |
January 22, 2016, 08:17 |
Pressure Boundary Condition
|
#1 |
New Member
Dave M.
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Koblenz, Germany
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 11 |
Hello everyone,
I need to clarify a general boundary condition issue. I have got a pressure inlet for a compressible flow with air. I have received the values for the boundary conditions from experimental data, which allows me to specify static pressure, total pressure and turbulence parameters. In my theoretical calculation my inlet should have: u=60m/s p_st=97,878Pa T=289K =>rho=1.1785kg/m³ (resulting from isentropic change of state with pi=0.97878) p_tot= 100,000Pa Using a pressure inlet allows me to specify the total pressure and an initial guess for static pressure. After a converged calculation, the solution values for the inlet show different values. The mean velocity is about 88m/s and the static pressure 95,400Pa, which is completely wrong. Does anybody know, how a) to correctly input the boundary values, that the results show the values I want to see and b) why there are those differences? (velocity inlet does not work here) Help is much appreciated. Regards |
|
January 22, 2016, 10:31 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,675
Rep Power: 66 |
Be careful with static vs total temperature and make sure you are giving the right values.
But you need to pay attention to your outlet boundary conditions, the static pressure at the inlet will depend on those. |
|
January 22, 2016, 11:44 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Dave M.
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Koblenz, Germany
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 11 |
Which means, that the iterated inlet conditions for the static pressure and velocity result from the boundary conditions given at the pressure-outlet? Maybe I should try to vary the gauge pressure at the outlet - I used the values from my experimental results. But this is a good point to examine.
|
|
January 22, 2016, 12:08 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,675
Rep Power: 66 |
That is correct.
Your CFD results will of course differ by experimental values. There are various ways to compare with experimental values. You could specify the outlet pressure, the inlet pressure & mass-flow from the CFD will differ from the experiment by some %. Or you can match the mass-flow, in which case the pressure drop or pressure ratio will be differ from the experiment by some %. A note to readers unfamiliar with the topic: In addition to any temperature (either static or stagnation) specifying both static and stagnation pressures effectively turns the pressure inlet into a velocity inlet. |
|
January 22, 2016, 12:22 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Dave M.
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Koblenz, Germany
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 11 |
Thank you. I will try the outlet-value-modification in order to get the accurate results at the inlet.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Appropriate pressure boundary condition in incompressible flow | lonelywing | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 21 | June 6, 2022 09:44 |
Wind turbine simulation | Saturn | CFX | 58 | July 3, 2020 01:13 |
pressure outlet boundary condition | hamid_reza | Fluent Multiphase | 1 | September 9, 2014 13:43 |
Question about heat transfer coefficient setting for CFX | Anna Tian | CFX | 1 | June 16, 2013 06:28 |
Water subcooled boiling | Attesz | CFX | 7 | January 5, 2013 03:32 |