CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Boussinesq approximation (temperature gradient range)

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 12, 2016, 10:46
Question Boussinesq approximation (temperature gradient range)
  #1
New Member
 
a0407
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 9
azizi0407 is on a distinguished road
I'm simulating a natural convection in fluent using bossinesq approximation. I was told that the temperature gradient of the system cannot be large. So, what is the range of the tempareture gradient that acceptable to use in fluent?

In experimental works, Rayleigh number of the natural convection is varies by the change of the temperature gradient. In CFD, what variable can we change to increased the Rayleigh number as the temperature gradient cannot be increase too much?
azizi0407 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 13, 2016, 03:32
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,649
Rep Power: 65
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
These are not CFD limitations. There are no limitations in Fluent, you impose the Boussinesq approximation and that's it.

The boussinesq approximation poses that the density change is linearly proportional to the temperature change. Boussinesq is valid as long as this is true physically.

If temperature variations are large then the Boussinesq approximation is no a longer valid physical approximation. Again, this is fault of the numerics but a modeling error and user fault.

Use an explicit equation of state like the ideal gas law if you don't want to deal with the temperature range issue.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 13, 2016, 04:18
Default
  #3
New Member
 
a0407
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 9
azizi0407 is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your answer.
azizi0407 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 11, 2023, 13:05
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Kadi
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 11
Kader is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyTran View Post
These are not CFD limitations. There are no limitations in Fluent, you impose the Boussinesq approximation and that's it.

The boussinesq approximation poses that the density change is linearly proportional to the temperature change. Boussinesq is valid as long as this is true physically.

If temperature variations are large then the Boussinesq approximation is no a longer valid physical approximation. Again, this is fault of the numerics but a modeling error and user fault.

Use an explicit equation of state like the ideal gas law if you don't want to deal with the temperature range issue.
The limitation is about Deata T=27°
Kader is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
boussinesq approximation, fluent, natural convection

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
question regarding LES of pipe flow - pimpleFoam Dan1788 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 37 December 26, 2017 15:42
Periodic flow using Cyclic - comparison with Fluent nusivares OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 30 December 12, 2017 06:35
How to create a temperature gradient in thin wall and two dimensions leggman7 Main CFD Forum 0 October 30, 2013 00:21
temperature gradient for use in surface monitor Catherine FLUENT 1 August 24, 2012 10:10
Boussinesq approximation, help please! engahmed FLUENT 0 May 20, 2010 12:25


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58.