CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

LES Open bounded jet - Smagorinsky or one equation KE?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 28, 2016, 11:47
Default LES Open bounded jet - Smagorinsky or one equation KE?
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9
diogof is on a distinguished road
Hey everyone,

I'm currently working on a FLUENT assignment which involves the use of LES in order to simulate a turbulent pulsating jet. The physical problem consists of a jet with a rectangular base 0.1x0.02m, at the base of a 2x4x0.02m domain, where each of the 0.02m sides is meant to be modelled as a symmetry boundary, with two grid points along the 0.02m side. The pulse is sine wave which is defined as a function of time in an UDF. The side walls and top wall are open, whereas the rest of the bottom base is a wall.

I am currently having some difficulty trying to choose which subgrid-scale model to use.

I think I understand that the default WALE model, as well as the WMLES models are probably not the best models to use in this case because they are tuned for wall-bounded flows. I think the best two options are either the dynamic Smagorinsky-Lilly (eddy viscosity) model or the Kinetic Energy Transport model.

When looking at papers online however, I can't find any reasons to choose one model over the other, and so I am stumped when trying to justify which model I have used and why. Do you have any recommendations?

Thank you in advance!
diogof is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 3, 2017, 18:11
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,679
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
I agree, ignore the WALE and WMLES stuff since they are not appropriate.

The original Smagorinsky-Lily and dynamic Smagorinsky SGS models are algebraic. The kinetic energy transport solves a transport equation for the subgrid scale kinetic energy. In this regard, I think the kinetic energy transport model is vastly superior (in theory). It's similar to using Prandtl's mixing length as a turbulence model versus the one-equation Spalart-Allmaras model. How well this theory is implemented and how accurately the numerical results compare with real world is another story.

Furthermore, I wouldn't expect much difference between original Smagorinsky versus Dynamic Smagorinsky. They should be similar.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 13, 2017, 14:36
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9
diogof is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your advice! For most of the results I've seen on papers, when comparing Smagorinsky and kinetic energy transport model to real-world data they both seem to be pretty close. I think I can justify using either one.
diogof is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
jet flow, kinetic energy, les, model, smagorinsky

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Custom Thermophysical Properties wsmith02 OpenFOAM 4 June 1, 2023 14:30
Problem installing on Ubuntu 9.10 -> 'Cannot open : No such file or directory' mfiandor OpenFOAM Installation 2 January 25, 2010 09:50
Version 15 on Mac OS X gschaider OpenFOAM Installation 113 December 2, 2009 10:23
DxFoam reader update hjasak OpenFOAM Post-Processing 69 April 24, 2008 01:24
OpenFOAM with IBM AIX matthias OpenFOAM Installation 20 March 25, 2008 02:36


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:59.