|
[Sponsors] |
March 9, 2018, 10:02 |
DPM particle tracking
|
#1 |
New Member
nirjhor
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11 |
I have noticed that for surface injection the number of particle does not change, with respect to the change of mass flow rate. I am just wondering, why is that.
Since the mass of each particle is constant by the diameter and density, I thought increasing mass flow rate should increase the particle number. Can anyone please help me to clarify it? |
|
March 12, 2018, 02:27 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
Hello Sonnet,
Have you gone through following posts: DPM Injections Controlling Number of particles in Surface Injection (DPM) Hope it helps.. |
|
March 13, 2018, 07:41 |
|
#3 |
New Member
nirjhor
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11 |
thanks kummi,
i have read those. but they are not helpful. it still does not explain how same amount of particle capture the increased mass flow, when the dia, velocity and density is predefined. sorry for asking so many questions. many thanks |
|
March 13, 2018, 07:43 |
|
#4 |
New Member
nirjhor
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11 |
moreover, i have tried to do the single injection with the sqipt as shown below. i have saved it as .inj file on the directory. It is not working.
can you please check it. (( x y z u v w diameter temperature mass-flow ) name ) (( 30 0 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 1 ) ((28.97777479 7.764571353 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 2 ) (( 25.98076211 15 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 3 ) (( 21.21320344 21.21320344 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 4 ) (( 15 25.98076211 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 5 ) (( 7.764571353 28.97777479 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 6 ) (( 1.83772E-15 30 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 7 ) (( -7.764571353 28.97777479 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 8 ) (( -15 25.98076211 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 9 ) (( -21.21320344 21.21320344 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 10 ) (( -25.98076211 15 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 11 ) (( -28.97777479 7.764571353 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 12 ) (( -30 3.67545E-15 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 13 ) (( -28.97777479 -7.764571353 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 14 ) (( -25.98076211 -15 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 15 ) (( -21.21320344 -21.21320344 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 16 ) (( -15 -25.98076211 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 17 ) (( -7.764571353 -28.97777479 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 18 ) (( -5.51317E-15 -30 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 19 ) (( 7.764571353 -28.97777479 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 20 ) (( 15 -25.98076211 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 21 ) (( 21.21320344 -21.21320344 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 22 ) (( 25.98076211 -15 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 23 ) (( 28.97777479 -7.764571353 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 24 ) (( 30 -7.35089E-15 -140.98 0 0 31.678 0.25 288 0.5 ) 25 ) |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DPM particle tracking considering particle size | oball | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 4 | October 6, 2019 14:42 |
Particle tracking error | alchem | OpenFOAM Bugs | 5 | May 6, 2017 16:30 |
Ubuntu 12.10 + openfoam2.2.0 ==> paraview error message | peteryuan | OpenFOAM Installation | 6 | August 18, 2013 18:00 |
DPM particle tracking in stirred tank | parisa- | FLUENT | 1 | August 7, 2012 12:03 |
DPM UDF particle position using the macro P_POS(p)[i] | dm2747 | FLUENT | 0 | April 17, 2009 01:29 |