CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Time Step Size

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 19, 2018, 05:26
Default Time Step Size
  #1
Car
New Member
 
Caro
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Germany
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 7
Car is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,




I need to simulate a lime fouling process. I want information about the fouling layer thickness, the changing of the heat conductivity and the temperature that appear during a year.

I already got the model. Now I face the problem of the calculation time. I wonder if I can set the time step up to an hour, if I start the simulation with a small time step size (~0.0001) and slowly increase the time step size as the simulation converges.




Carolin
Car is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 19, 2018, 10:57
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,680
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
There isn't a time-step ramp option. You have to script the changes or change it manually.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 19, 2018, 23:05
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Alexander
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,363
Rep Power: 34
AlexanderZ will become famous soon enoughAlexanderZ will become famous soon enough
As LuckyTran mentioned you may do it using UDF, take a look into DEFINE_DELTAT macro
More information in ANsys Fluent Customization manual

best regards
AlexanderZ is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 20, 2018, 03:13
Default
  #4
Car
New Member
 
Caro
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Germany
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 7
Car is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your answer!

I think I didn't pose the question properly. What I want to know is if it will affect the results' accuracy if I set the time step size to 1800 sec.

Has anyone a suggestion?
Car is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 20, 2018, 03:20
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Alexander
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,363
Rep Power: 34
AlexanderZ will become famous soon enoughAlexanderZ will become famous soon enough
It depends on your model
How fast physical processes you model comparing to timestep you want?

best regards
AlexanderZ is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 21, 2018, 06:13
Default
  #6
Car
New Member
 
Caro
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Germany
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 7
Car is on a distinguished road
Dear AlexanderZ,

I'm not sure if I understand your question, so I try to explain my model a bit.

I use DEFINE_PROPERTY to define the thick walls thermal conductivity. The conductivity slowly decreases (as a consequence of the growing fouling layer which has a lower conductivity than the wall).
Due to this UDF I thought the temperature of the fluid should slowly decrease. But this isn't the case. I found the temperature increasing just a little (about 0.001 K in a month). I wonder why this happens and I think it might be a problem with the time step size.

As you can see, the change in the system is very small. Regarding your last answer am I right to think that the time step size should therefore be very small as well?


Thank you for your help!


Carolin
Car is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 23, 2018, 20:55
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Alexander
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,363
Rep Power: 34
AlexanderZ will become famous soon enoughAlexanderZ will become famous soon enough
Does your wall have thickness? (it should have)
Did you put any heatsource on the wall? (probably, you should put)
What about your mesh, did you resolve boundary layer?
If all abouve is correct and you have such a slow change in temperature, then I would increase timestep, if I were you.

best regards
AlexanderZ is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Other] Contribution a new utility: refine wall layer mesh based on yPlus field lakeat OpenFOAM Community Contributions 58 December 23, 2021 02:36
Transient simulation not converging skabilan OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 14 December 16, 2019 23:12
simpleFoam error - "Floating point exception" mbcx4jc2 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 12 August 4, 2015 02:20
Micro Scale Pore, icoFoam gooya_kabir OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 November 2, 2013 13:58
Problems in compiling paraview in Suse 10.3 platform chiven OpenFOAM Installation 3 December 1, 2009 07:21


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:13.