CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Issue in interaction of particle with DO radiation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 18, 2019, 01:29
Default Issue in interaction of particle with DO radiation
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 7
subham998 is on a distinguished road
Dear All,

I am currently trying to heat up an inert particle using a radiation beam from a semi-transparent wall using the Discrete-Ordinates Radiation model. I have switched on the particle radiation interaction, however, the particle is not absorbing the incident radiation. I have attached the file for your reference. Could you please let me know what I might be missing? I also want to bring to your notice that I had run the same case a few weeks ago and the inert particle was getting heated(particle and fluid temperature distribution is attached), but don't know why it isn't working now.


Last edited by subham998; November 18, 2019 at 06:12.
subham998 is offline   Reply With Quote


do radiation model, dpm fluent model, particle track fluent, radiation interaction

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Issue with radiation direction in fluent DO Model SBhat FLUENT 4 October 24, 2020 05:57
Radiation Modeling Chris89 CFX 20 August 14, 2014 07:51
GETVAR Error in Multiband Monte Carlo Radiation Simulation with Directional Source silvan CFX 3 June 16, 2014 09:49
About particle radiation kris Siemens 0 July 31, 2005 20:45
interaction time between particle and eddies Steve FLUENT 0 April 10, 2001 18:17

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:36.