|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
|
While meshing a pipe for simulation as periodic, is it safe to consider computational domain dimensions used in the case of periodic channel?
ANSYS recommendation states that the size of the computational domain for a straight channel with channel height H is taken as 4H in the stream-wise direction and 1.5H in the span-wise direction. For all considered Reynolds numbers, the computational grid is unchanged in the stream-wise and span-wise directions with a uniform grid-spacing of 0.05H and 0.025H, respectively. Can this rule, while determining stream-wise length, be considered for straight pipe as well? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,146
Rep Power: 61 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
For LES/DNS, pipe length matters a lot for reasons having to do with physics.
For RANS, I've (frequently) simulated as short as 1 pipe diameter on nice grids. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
ansys, fluent, mesh, periodic, pipe |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Periodic Pipe Flow LES; parabolic profile | jrrelx | FLUENT | 34 | August 13, 2015 17:58 |
setup problems - LES pipe flow with cyclic BC (1) and direct mapped inlet (2) | florian_krause | OpenFOAM | 22 | June 13, 2013 21:25 |
Disturbed flow field at outlet boundary (Multiphase flow through pipe) | Michiel | CFX | 17 | April 21, 2010 10:14 |
flow in perforated pipe distributor | pertupd | ANSYS | 0 | August 12, 2009 08:36 |
periodic fully developed flow in pipe | periodicbc | FLUENT | 5 | January 12, 2004 15:57 |