CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Received fatal signal(segmentation fault)

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree3Likes
  • 1 Post By vinerm
  • 1 Post By vinerm
  • 1 Post By vinerm

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 31, 2020, 00:09
Default Received fatal signal(segmentation fault)
  #1
New Member
 
Muhammad Rameez ud din
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 6
Rimzy is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am doing simulation of solar loading on evacuated tube. After developing geometry and mesh, when I opened the setup i received this error:
'Received fatal signal(segmentation fault)'
The same model successfully opened yesterday in setup when i inserted some model conditions but after that PC got hanged then i switched off PC. But today i am trying from last 3 hours its giving the same problem. Can anyone please help me? Thanks
Attached Images
File Type: jpg fatal-signal.jpg (80.4 KB, 11 views)
Rimzy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 31, 2020, 05:15
Default Export Mesh
  #2
Senior Member
 
vinerm's Avatar
 
Vinerm
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
vinerm will become famous soon enough
Hi Muhammad

It appears that there are incomplete interfaces. Recommended would be to open Meshing, ensure that there are not contacts under connections, generate the mesh, and export it. Set up the case again.

If you wish to continue with WB, it would still be advisable to remove contacts and regenerate the mesh.
__________________
Regards,
Vinerm

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 31, 2020, 07:42
Smile Masse tansfer
  #3
New Member
 
Djamila
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Algeria
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 10
djamila77 is on a distinguished road
Dear all;
I am trying to simulate convection and masse transfer in cavity
I don't know how to applied it in fluent (masse transfer ) and how I can add the concentration equation to the convectif equation.
please help me
Best
djamila77 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 31, 2020, 08:33
Default Type of mass transfer
  #4
Senior Member
 
vinerm's Avatar
 
Vinerm
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
vinerm will become famous soon enough
What type of mass transfer exists in your case? Is it from one phase to another phase? Is it due to any reaction? Or is it not the mass transfer but convection of component(s) from one location to another, such as, smoke movement?
__________________
Regards,
Vinerm

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 2, 2020, 03:37
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Muhammad Rameez ud din
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 6
Rimzy is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinerm View Post
Hi Muhammad

It appears that there are incomplete interfaces. Recommended would be to open Meshing, ensure that there are not contacts under connections, generate the mesh, and export it. Set up the case again.

If you wish to continue with WB, it would still be advisable to remove contacts and regenerate the mesh.
Thank you for help.
Do you mean that i should suppress all contacts under connections?
Rimzy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 2, 2020, 04:33
Default Delete the contacts
  #6
Senior Member
 
vinerm's Avatar
 
Vinerm
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
vinerm will become famous soon enough
Instead of suppression, delete the contacts. However, you have to ensure that in the Meshing tool when you click on Geometry, it shows only one part that contains all the bodies. If the bodies are listed individually under Geometry branch then you should go back to modeling tool to ensure that bodies have shared topology. Use Form New Part in DM and Share in Workbench tab in SCDM.
__________________
Regards,
Vinerm

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 2, 2020, 06:38
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Muhammad Rameez ud din
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 6
Rimzy is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinerm View Post
Instead of suppression, delete the contacts. However, you have to ensure that in the Meshing tool when you click on Geometry, it shows only one part that contains all the bodies. If the bodies are listed individually under Geometry branch then you should go back to modeling tool to ensure that bodies have shared topology. Use Form New Part in DM and Share in Workbench tab in SCDM.
Ok. I will. currently i have 7 parts and 10 bodies under geometry in Mesh tool. By deleting all contacts would not affect results?
Rimzy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 2, 2020, 07:44
Default Moving mesh?
  #8
Senior Member
 
vinerm's Avatar
 
Vinerm
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
vinerm will become famous soon enough
If you have any moving mesh in your domains, then you have to keep multiple parts. Otherwise, you should have one part and all the bodies should belong to the same part. You can use different names for all the bodies in case you want to assign different materials or source terms or some other parameters. But by ensuring that all bodies belong to same part, you will have conformal mesh and simulation will run very smooth.
Rimzy likes this.
__________________
Regards,
Vinerm

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 3, 2020, 04:58
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Muhammad Rameez ud din
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 6
Rimzy is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinerm View Post
If you have any moving mesh in your domains, then you have to keep multiple parts. Otherwise, you should have one part and all the bodies should belong to the same part. You can use different names for all the bodies in case you want to assign different materials or source terms or some other parameters. But by ensuring that all bodies belong to same part, you will have conformal mesh and simulation will run very smooth.
As i have fluid inside the solid tubes so for fluid domain we always have moving mesh?
Rimzy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 3, 2020, 05:10
Default Fluid motion is not mesh motion
  #10
Senior Member
 
vinerm's Avatar
 
Vinerm
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
vinerm will become famous soon enough
The motion of the fluid is an outcome of the solution of conservation equations. Mesh motion is used only if there is a solid body moving or if the fluid body has a solid motion, i.e., fluid body moving with respect to the inertial frame, e.g., there is motion of fuel in the fuel tank of a vehicle, however, the fuel tank is also moving with respect to the ground. Otherwise, you do not need any mesh motion or frame motion.
Rimzy likes this.
__________________
Regards,
Vinerm

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 6, 2020, 02:49
Default
  #11
New Member
 
Djamila
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Algeria
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 10
djamila77 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinerm View Post
What type of mass transfer exists in your case? Is it from one phase to another phase? Is it due to any reaction? Or is it not the mass transfer but convection of component(s) from one location to another, such as, smoke movement?

Hi Vinerm;

In my case I have reaction,
but I don't understand the third case that you said;

can I ask something how to add the mass diffusion coefficient for the solidification case, do I need an UDF.

Thanks
djamila77 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 6, 2020, 03:16
Default Two threads together
  #12
Senior Member
 
vinerm's Avatar
 
Vinerm
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
vinerm will become famous soon enough
It appears that there are two threads running in parallel within this one.

Djamila, mass transfer could occur because of reactions, e.g., C becoming CO. Or it could be phase change, such as evaporation, condensation, or solidification. Or it could be combination. As far as solidification is concerned, you do not require a multiphase model. There is a separation solidification-melting model in Fluent. It is not multiphase.
djamila77 likes this.
__________________
Regards,
Vinerm

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fluentError: received a fatal signal (Segmentation fault). thomaszhangjing Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 11 January 13, 2021 09:37
Define momentum source error: receive a fatal signal(Segmentation fault) coewgb Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 4 April 30, 2018 09:14
Error: udf received a fatal signal(segmentation fault) BIANBOSHEN Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 2 February 8, 2017 03:54
received a fatal signal(segmentation fault) kihoon1214 Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 1 April 28, 2016 08:26
error while compiling the USER Sub routine CFD user CFX 3 November 25, 2002 15:16


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:47.