CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Fluent DPM Boundary Conditions

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 31, 2018, 23:02
Default Fluent DPM Boundary Conditions
  #1
New Member
 
Billy
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 8
Billy_ is on a distinguished road
Hi,

Is there any alternative boundary conditions which allow say, a box to be filled by particles. What I mean is that the particles are injected from the inlet and once injected, the 'outlet', instead of letting the particles escape or reflect, will stop the particles from escaping and will fill the box. I have played around with all boundary conditions but none work. 'Trap' just lets the particles disappear, and 'reflect' lets the particles bounce off and they never come to rest? Should the particles come to rest eventually if only falling from gravity, so far I have not been able to gain this result, which is obviously showing unrealistic results.

Alternatively, I have tried using patch in the initialization tab to patch in the solid particles however as I am only using the DPM and laminar model I cant do this either. I'm only using these models as gravity is the only real force in play if particles are being dropped from a height with no significant air flow.

So my questions:

1. Are there any boundary conditions that will allow me to fill a box with solid particles?
2. For particles falling from an inlet with no significant air flow, are the DPM model and laminar flow correct for this situation?
3. Can the patch initialization tool 'patch' solid particles into a volume at t=0? Basically my end goal is to analyse flow from a tank/silo but with solid particles instead of water.

Thanks in advance.
Billy_ is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2020, 05:32
Default
  #2
Member
 
Dnyanesh Mirikar
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 6
DnyanMiri is on a distinguished road
I hope you have found a solution to the above problem, if not I would like to suggest some points
1. Why don't you give 'wall' with 'Reflect' BC instead of 'outlet'. I think this will serve your purpose.
2. You have to check the volume fraction of the components. DPM is recommended of fractions below 12. You can use DDPM for a denser domain.
3. I'm not sure about this, as I have not used DPM with solid particles. I used it for droplet evaporation where I was able to assign an initial fraction of water vapor present in the domain. Hopefully, you can also do it for solid particles.
Thanks
DnyanMiri is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2020, 05:53
Default Particle in DPM
  #3
Senior Member
 
vinerm's Avatar
 
Vinerm
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
vinerm will become famous soon enough
Ideally, suspended particles can be simulated using DPM; suspended implies suspended in the fluid or collected as a heap. However, the practical challenge is that the position requires continuous update. If position change is insignificant, time-step required would be very small.

Another aspect is if the only force being considered is gravity; and to do that you need to ensure that drag coefficient is 0 and that would require drag function modification, default is spherical; then the particles will fall on to each other. This requires a model that can predict particle-particle interaction.

So, the only solution is to use DPM.

Do note that the Initialization panel can only initialize Eulerian fields. Lagrangian vectors are initialized using injections. To patch whole zone with particles, use either a volume injection or File injection. Volume injection is a beta option.
__________________
Regards,
Vinerm

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Out File does not show Imbalance in % Mmaragann CFX 5 January 20, 2017 10:20
Difficulty In Setting Boundary Conditions Moinul Haque CFX 4 November 25, 2014 17:30
Implementation of boundary conditions for FVM Tom Main CFD Forum 7 August 26, 2014 05:58
Fluent accuracy and boundary conditions Paolo Lampitella FLUENT 0 June 12, 2008 06:25
Convective Heat Transfer - Heat Exchanger Mark CFX 6 November 15, 2004 15:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:13.