|
[Sponsors] |
effective thermal conductivity and mass weighted thermal conductivity |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 18, 2020, 05:53 |
effective thermal conductivity and mass weighted thermal conductivity
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Weiqiang Liu
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 278
Rep Power: 9 |
Hi all,
I am modeling a hydrogen combustion in porous zone with fluent. I used a UDS to solve solid energy equation and also the energy equation of fluid is modified. For fluid energy equation, I modified thermal conductivity of fluid to an effective thermal conductivity. Specificly, effective thermal conductivity is mass weighted thermal conductivity added with an additional term. Then I need to define source term for both solid and fluid energy equation and fluid thermal conductivity will be used in the source terms as well. My question is: for the thermal conductivity emerged in source term, should I should use the value return by DEFINE_PROPERTY which is effective thermal conductivity or the original mass weighted averaged velocity? According to the symbols emerged in paper, it seems like original mass weighted thermal conductivity should be used. However, I am not very sure. Can anybody give me some suggestions? Best regards Weiqiang |
|
Tags |
define_property, define_source, effective conductivity, mass weighted |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Setting the height of the stream in the free channel | kevinmccartin | CFX | 12 | October 13, 2022 21:43 |
Domain Reference Pressure and mass flow inlet boundary | AdidaKK | CFX | 75 | August 20, 2018 05:37 |
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 05:21 |
Ansys CFX problem: unexpected very high temperatures in premix laminar combustion | faizan_habib7 | CFX | 4 | February 1, 2016 17:00 |
Constant velocity of the material | Sas | CFX | 15 | July 13, 2010 08:56 |