CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

How to enforce zero velocity along walls of rotating channel?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 19, 2020, 10:25
Default How to enforce zero velocity along walls of rotating channel?
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 65
Rep Power: 7
cfdnewb123 is on a distinguished road
I am working on rotating turbulent channel flow and have test it for 2D & 3D. However, I keep getting non-zero velocity for the node point at the wall. This causes a sharp transition from wall surface to fluid flow which is unphysical. The solver works fine when I set rotation to zero and thus, I suspect I may have set my rotation incorrectly.

For my 3D solver, I set periodic boundary conditions along x and z directions. The flow is driven by dP/dx=-1 which is specify in the periodic conditions. To introduce rotation, I set the walls at y=-h & y=h to rotate along the z-axis at -20 rad/s.
I also try using frame motion instead but the result is much worst. I have no idea how to correctly introduce the rotation.

I can't upload the image here and thus, I have add the relevant link.

Without rotation, the velocity profile is alright as both of its ends starts from zero.
https://imgur.com/oyqMzOs

However, with rotation and at a nonzero distance from rotational axis, both ends of the velocity profile is equal to the wall rotational velocity at that point.
https://imgur.com/FdGa5fm

How do I ensure that both ends of the velocity profile starts from zero? According to the paper I am using, the "wall friction velocity is prescribed and kept constant in all numerical computations" and I believe that is the key to my problem. However, I can't seem to explicitly compute the wall friction velocity on Fluent...
cfdnewb123 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 19, 2020, 10:56
Default Wall Motion
  #2
Senior Member
 
vinerm's Avatar
 
Vinerm
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
vinerm will become famous soon enough
You have set walls to be moving, therefore, it is obvious that the velocities at the nodes on the walls are non-zero. If you don't want that, i.e., if the walls are stationary with respect to inertial frame, then you should set their absolute velocity to 0 or their relative velocity equal and opposite to that of cell zone velocity.
__________________
Regards,
Vinerm

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 19, 2020, 11:54
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 65
Rep Power: 7
cfdnewb123 is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the response! I resolved it by manually removing the velocity profile from the imposed wall rotation.
cfdnewb123 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 5, 2020, 04:45
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 6
bam28 is on a distinguished road
hello cfdnewb123,
Could you please explain in detail how did you solve the problem? I am facing a similar problem. Thank you so much.
bam28 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
boundaries condition, mesh, rotation, turbulence


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rotating domain vs Wall velocity Jiricbeng CFX 16 January 30, 2020 09:06
3D Rotating Channel Curtin University FLUENT 5 November 9, 2018 02:25
Velocity profile is not turbulent (OPEN CHANNEL FLOW) roi247 FLUENT 2 March 15, 2017 07:30
UDF for 3d velocity inlet profile in channel flow Thejas4ansys Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 0 April 1, 2016 15:09
rotating channel emilio Siemens 1 April 6, 2012 00:21


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:53.