|
[Sponsors] |
Switching from linear to second order methods |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 16, 2021, 17:03 |
Switching from linear to second order methods
|
#1 |
Member
Adithya
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 73
Rep Power: 4 |
Hello
I have been simulating an aircraft using the SA turbulence model. Mesh quality is good. Steady state. I have been having divergence problems when I run it with these settings: Coupled with time factor 0.1, green gauss node based, second order discretization. So, I decided to run a first order analysis and then use that to initialize my second order case. The first order uses SIMPLE and first order for all discretization parameters. I decreased certain under relaxation parameters. This offers stability and even converges. When do I switch from the first order to the second order? Is there a recommended value that the residuals need to drop below for me to make the switch or should i switch after it converges? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Are all first order upwind methods monotone? | Jaydi_21 | Main CFD Forum | 13 | October 3, 2018 18:21 |
references on high order methods | naffrancois | Main CFD Forum | 5 | January 8, 2018 11:07 |
SimpleFoam high order schemes | vcvedant | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | September 19, 2017 11:38 |
A turbulent test case for rhoCentralFoam | immortality | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 13 | April 20, 2014 06:32 |
High order methods in commercial use? | cfdnewbie | Main CFD Forum | 5 | January 12, 2012 05:51 |